Directed by:
Tommy WirkolaCinematography:
Matthew WestonComposer:
Dominic LewisCast:
David Harbour, John Leguizamo, Alex Hassell, Alexis Louder, Cam Gigandet, Edi Patterson, Beverly D'Angelo, Leah Brady, Alexander Elliot, Brendan Fletcher (more)VOD (4)
Plots(1)
When a team of mercenaries breaks into a wealthy family compound on Christmas Eve, taking everyone inside hostage, the team isn’t prepared for a surprise combatant: Santa Claus is on the grounds, and he’s about to show why this Nick is no saint. (Universal Pictures US)
Videos (6)
Reviews (10)
For me, this won’t become a Christmas classic. What a shame! The first trailers promised a perfectly outrageous black comedy. The film has two excellent aspects (which I can’t deny). David Harbour thoroughly enjoyed his role as the foul-mouthed Santa, and I bought into it completely (his backstory was also amusing... I definitely didn’t expect a theme about Viking PTSD even in my wildest dreams). The second aspect is the decent action, with one standout scene in the barn being particularly noteworthy (I might revisit that scene occasionally... an interesting use of skates :D). Unfortunately, the film doesn’t work at all on a story level. Yes, I’m willing to forgive a lot within the genre, but it shouldn’t be overwhelmed by illogical elements. Leguizamo didn’t quite fit as the villain, nor did the main family with the little girl. It has some production quality (David Leitch handled the production), so it wasn’t a complete disaster. On the other hand, I see it as nothing more than a decent one-off. I give it 6.5/10. P.S. On a second viewing, I wouldn’t be as critical. Sure, it’s a silly film, but it’s devilishly entertaining. David Harbour was born for this role. But I’ll keep the rating the same :D
()
Merry fuc*ing Christmas!! David Harbour as an alcoholic Santa with a dark killer past (I commend the awesome origin story!!) flying his reindeer through the starry skies and urinating on the residents below versus a bunch of killers in a house with a family that hates each other? Fuck yeah! This is like John Wick at Christmas, and clearly the best gift I could ask for at the end of the year. The humour goes at full speed, it's properly perverse and raunchy, but most importantly it's superbly integrated into the plot and feels natural and not pushed to the limit. Even the opening sequence, when Santa walks around the houses and instead of presents he brings out all sorts of disgusting things, grounded the whole cinema in their seats and made it clear what the spirit of the rest of the film would be. The characters of the attacked family are archetypically great, from the spoiled brats, to the funny goofballs, to the good guys, and likewise the gang of killers with nicknames like Candy or Gingerbread get plenty of space and have a great time! The film takes the best of similar genre pieces, wraps it up in an excellent Christmas package and works very cleverly with the Christmas motifs, hence there is no shortage of murders using lights, decorative chains, ornaments, icicles, skates and a even nativity scene. The definite highlights are the sequences in the style of Home Alone and the rampage with Thor's hammer, you don’t know know whether to laugh or groan at the violence. Violent Night is a literal end of the year treat, which apart from a few sentimental emotional conversations has no deaf spots, perfectly combines violence, parodic humour, Christmas atmosphere and family comedy in a hell of a style and I have to admit that I didn't expect this kind of fun. Tommy Wirkola just did it.
()
In the golden age of Hong Kong cinema, when several dozen action films vied for viewers’ attention every year, the rule was that the way to distinguish one’s film from those of the competition was to include previously unseen attractions, or at least a unique screenplay, setting and overall visual or subgenre stylization. The filmmakers from 87North Productions consciously follow the Hong Kong tradition in many respects. Unfortunately, however, over the four years since they stopped being mere subcontractors providing choreography for action scenes and started producing movies themselves, they have reached a point where, instead of amazement and excitement, their films evoke only a superficially altered impression of something that has already been seen. This was inevitable, because unlike in the case of the major productions from the golden age of Hong Kong cinema, they have nowhere to grow. On the one hand, they have no competition, but no one will entrust them with bigger budgets that would enable them to further develop. Furthermore, they don’t have any stars other than Keanu Reeves who would devote themselves to the action genre, work on themselves and continually impress viewers with new stunts. On the other hand, it didn’t matter that Nobody is a variation on John Wick, because the film was carried by the excellent Bob Odenkirk. The same was true of Kate in relation to Atomic Blonde thanks to Mary Elizabeth Winstead and the pop-Japanese stylisation. Not to mention that in both of these cases the choreography worked with real physical aspects and a specific setting. But Violent Night not only comes across in its choreography as a derivative of the same company’s previous films, but the thing that is supposed to make it different is in itself derivative. The whole film blatantly paraphrases Home Alone and Die Hard, this time with Santa Claus himself battling the highly capable bad guys. Unfortunately, in practice this is all reduced to the insipid juvenile attraction of Santa cursing with a broken nose and a blood-soaked beard through most of the film. Of course, he also uses Christmas items like tree ornaments to eliminate his enemies. However, the film peculiarly comes most alive when it dispenses with the would-be shocking of American viewers stupefied by the illusion of Christmas and moves to the attic in the manner of Home Alone and to the tool shed in the style of Commando. But even these flashes of inventiveness (though still derivative) cannot obscure the desperate fact that David Harbour doesn’t have the charisma to carry an entire film on his own and that Tommy Wirkola is a master of gimmick movies whose final execution falls far short of the promise of their catchy concepts.
()
David Harbour is half of the film. He was made to play the role of a kind-hearted Santa Claus with the roots of a bad-ass Viking. The mixing of motifs from Die Hard and Home Alone, which are Christmas cult classics in America, is the right way to join their ranks in different genre garb. Wirkola almost succeeded – he combines Christmas clichés with new ideas, the endangered family members are not cliches and the narrative flows nicely. It’s just a shame that Harbour doesn’t face any correspondingly interesting bad guys for whom we would have more respect.
()
Tommy Wirkola combined the story of a Santa who lost his faith in Christmas with Die Hard. A rich family is gathered in their well-guarded mansion for the holidays when they are attacked by evil kidnappers just as Santa is eating cookies from one of the few good girls there. David Harbour is initially profiled as a pudgy drunk who wants to quit his job, but when glimpses into the past reveal his origins, he takes on an almost mythical dimension. Then, when he picks up a sledgehammer in a shed and goes to rescue the little girl, things get intense, with mashed-up heads, dismembered kidnappers and ground-up soldiers. The action is not blurred and it’s also innovative in a Christmas way. The jokes ooze with cynicism, the references to Home Alone are downright brutal. It’s just a little slow at times, you need some patience at first, but most of the time it's great fun.
()
Ads