Directed by:
Robert MulliganScreenplay:
Horton FooteCinematography:
Russell HarlanComposer:
Elmer BernsteinCast:
Gregory Peck, Mary Badham, Phillip Alford, John Megna, Frank Overton, Rosemary Murphy, Ruth White, Brock Peters, Robert Duvall, Paul Fix, Collin Wilcox Paxton (more)VOD (3)
Plots(1)
In a small Alabama town in 1932, Atticus Finch, a widowed lawyer, strives to create for his two children, 6-year-old Scout and her 10-year-old brother, Jem, an atmosphere free from hatred and prejudice. The youngsters lead a carefree life, racing about the town, jeering at eccentric Mrs. Dubose, and frightening themselves and their new friend, 6-year-old Dill Harris, with exaggerated stories about Boo Radley, a mentally retarded neighbor whom they have never seen. When Atticus agrees to defend Tom Robinson, a Negro accused of raping young Mayella Ewell, the children must defend themselves against the taunts of their classmates. Though Atticus is able to demonstrate Tom's innocence, forcing Mayella to admit that her father beat her when he found her making advances toward Tom, the all-white jury returns a verdict of guilty. Atticus tries to have the decision reversed, but before he can do so, Tom attempts to escape and is killed. In revenge against Atticus, Bob Ewell one day attacks Scout and Jem; but Boo Radley, who has secretly watched over the children and has left gifts for them in a tree trunk, saves them by killing Ewell. Sheriff Tate concludes that Ewell fell on his own knife and decides that there will be no trial. (official distributor synopsis)
(more)Videos (12)
Reviews (5)
I enjoyed the notorious Southern hospitality combined with the notorious Southern racism. I also enjoyed Gregory Peck's performance, and to my huge surprise, I didn't even mind the child actors, but... The film felt really archaic; the main character didn't have a scratch on his shiny armor, and I'm not a fan of such virtuous characters. The slow introduction dragged on like a partially frozen snail dowsed in honey, and it seemed much longer than the actual main storyline, while the events in the courtroom felt somewhat rushed. However, Atticus' speech about equality before American justice was hilarious and brought me cynical joy. Despite the criticism, I still think it's a good film because there are lessons to take from it, and I appreciate its poetic elements. My main problem was that my expectations were much higher, and they were not met.
()
Ready, aim, fire. It’s that easy. Like killing a mockingbird. Harper Lee used the title of her celebrated autobiographical novel not only in this sense. It is also a crucial acknowledgement of the protagonist, Jean Louise Finch. Killing a bluejay and killing a mockingbird are not the same thing. The film adaptation of the riveting novel is not so riveting itself. The Southern atmosphere, inhospitable to blacks (and anyone who supports them), is represented mainly by one character, the truly diabolical Bob Ewell (= evil). Of course, the film doesn’t make it clear that “that” is present in the vast majority of people. Of all the themes contained in the book, the filmmakers give priority to the issue of racism, which explains why the instructive episodes with the morphine-addicted Mrs. Dubose were edited out and why there is a complete lack of other characters (Aunt Alexandra) who influence the children’s way of thinking. The long court scene and the subsequent quick ending (the book’s plot covering three years is condensed into roughly one year) create the impression that the film should have been a courtroom drama. Would some added minutes have helped? No, two hours are enough, but in my opinion, what’s essential is not dealt with in that amount of time. The film lacks the dark magic of the adult world that as children we longed to discover, vaguely intuiting what dangers that involves. The title of the feature-length documentary about the film, Fearful Symmetry, captures it exactly. Another film, with a weaker story, stands out in every aspect with its “fearful symmetry”, namely The Night of the Hunter. Appendix: Martin Arnold’s entertaining experiment Passage á l'acte encourages an alternative view on To Kill a Mockingbird and other, similar mainstream films. 75%
()
A very powerful film that is definitely worth seeing. Legal dramas generally have the potential to be powerful, but here, it's also about drama outside the courtroom, about childhood drama, and about human drama. This is a film that gets under your skin and shows you that justice truly takes on many different forms. And sometimes it's unfair.
()
I was expecting a classic courtroom drama based on ideas about racism, but what I got was a very original and beautifully retold story from rural America, which through the recollections of a little girl reflects an unpleasant time not only in a depressing but also in a pleasantly exaggerated and purely childlike way. The performances are of course dominated by Peck, but it's also certainly nice to see a young Robert Duvall before he went into the service of the mafia:-) My only criticism would be the slightly odd ending, which didn't avoid patheticism and went too far off the rails in my opinion. Or, on the contrary, immersed itself in it with gusto. :) 85%
()
A wonderful, perhaps a little slower-developing film with the wonderful Gregory Peck. Together with Inherit the Wind and Judgment at Nuremberg, this film forms my personal, imaginary top of the list of courtroom stories that never get boring, although entertainment is the last thing on my mind when watching them.
()
Ads