A Haunting in Venice

A Haunting in Venice is very different from Kenneth Branagh's previous Poirot films. The less star-studded cast and smaller budget are not problem, the effort to use enclosed spaces for clever and spectacular camera games is nice, and it manages to be pleasantly creepy. An interesting and pleasant change. If Branagh plays with atmosphere and genre like this in future adaptations, I'll be happy to be there. (09/13/2023)

Kenneth Branagh's first Poirot installment, which isn't an adaptation of a well-known novel, tested the strength of his era for the first time. While Murder on the Orient Express and Death on the Nile sparked various debates because these cases always had multiple versions, "Hallowe'en Party" never belonged among notoriously famous novels. So far, there have only been two television adaptations - Hallowe'en Party (2010) and Meurtre à la kermesse (2014). The concept of a Halloween horror in the confined space of a Venetian palace is exquisite. Likewise, Poirot's interaction with the famous Ariadne Oliver is excellent. It's a great affair that practically instantly becomes an autumn classic. If Branagh continues with this, it would be ideal to choose another lesser-known case. However, it's potentially unfortunate to shift the entire thing into the post-war world (this film is set in 1947), thus closing off the opportunity to further develop Poirot's real interwar world. (09/14/2023)

For me, this was quite a big disappointment. No, I haven’t seen Death on the Nile yet. However, I can compare this film to Murder on the Orient Express, and that one wins by a long shot. The idea of combining a classic detective story with horror elements seemed interesting on paper, but the result felt rather jarring. One wants to enjoy the intricate relationships and the murder investigation, but that’s hard to do when the film tries to scare you (and does so in a rather cheap way, even by horror standards). I also agree with the criticism that setting it in Venice was completely unnecessary. Why choose such a picturesque city when 90% of the plot takes place indoors? I don’t understand...On the other hand, Kenneth Branagh was excellent. I enjoy his eccentric take on Poirot (a similar example would be Craig’s Benoit Blanc from the Knives Out series). It’s extravagant but effective. As for the story with supernatural elements, I expected a more ingenious explanation. For a blockbuster, the ending felt rather lazy and poorly executed. What a shame. I give it a 5.5/10. (09/19/2023)

Kenneth Branagh continues with the same, generic whodunit that is a carbon copy of the previous one. Only instead of the sunny Nile Delta with its often overly digital Pyramids, we have mysterious Venice, specifically a gothic house full of strange sounds and untold secrets. Not a single moment is remarkable, not a single shot or sequence of events unpredictable. At least it is briskly told and with a few wannabe horror moments and a decent production design, and it also has a decent (meaning short) running time. (02/15/2024)

Kenneth Branagh has conceived the third installment of his Poirot series in a completely different way than the first two, with a horror, schizophrenic atmosphere that flirts with the mystery genre and leaves the hero initially floundering and unsure. Haris Zambarloukos's camera alternates between unconventional angles of waterlogged rooms and views of a drizzly Venice in an amazing way, perfectly emphasizing that uncertainty. The sound design is amazing and really stands out in Dolby Atmos. The plot, for me, is unorthodox and the denouement is unexpected. This concept suited me very well and I'm looking forward to the sequel. (09/14/2023)