Payback

I've always liked Mel Gibson, and in this tough thriller where he plays an action hero, he just clicked for me. The whole thing is stylized, almost like it was filmed based on a comic book. The source material was a novel, but they managed the visual aspect quite well. It's appropriately tough, and the story isn't completely silly and is actually quite well-developed. This film appealed to me a long time ago, and nothing has changed even after some time has passed. (05/07/2014)

A rakish, hardheaded gangster played by Mel Gibson, the pretty blonde he cares about, a couple of dumb corrupt cops, a pile of violence, some sado-masochism and, mainly, a dozen goons whose “coolness” increases as they gradually get to know each other, from the biggest bungler to the biggest, toughest and most uncompromising boss. And all of this wrapped up in nostalgic, grey-blue camera filters and hellishly black humour. A delicious treat! (08/10/2002)

A stylish noir-gangster movie with a persuasive Mel Gibson in the lead role of a hardened thief, Porter. Helgeland managed to reproduce the exact atmosphere of most of Donald E. Westlake's books (Payback was based on "The Hunter" published under the pseudonym Richard Stark) and shows a world full of villains, junkies, hookers, corrupt cops, sadists and just plain idiots with whom the main character encounters. Accompanied by a sarcastic voice-over monologue, Porter slowly works his way to his seventy thousand dollars which was stolen from him by his partner Val and his wife. The way in which he eliminates all obstacles is simply cool, and you have to keep your fingers crossed for him even if you don't want to. After a while you don’t mind the plot’s predictability, and that you’ve seen this somewhere before, as you get carried away by a world that's as hard as scotch-soaked kidneys, but also damn relatable. My personal Top 20. (09/11/2006)

Genre-wise Payback is essentially an unclassifiable film. It doesn't have a classic plot, it doesn't distinguish between good and evil, and it also doesn't map out the actions of the main characters. Mel Gibson is a man of moral principles and that's where it ends, he can't be called either “good” or “bad”, and perhaps that's exactly what makes Payback such a stylish ride. Of course there is also a polished formal side (filters, sets, cinematography) and a few gems (sadomasochism, a parade of bosses, corrupt cops, etc.) that cannot be overlooked and are captivating matter what you think of them. The plot is basically banal, but everything works like a well-oiled machine. Brian Helgeland is damn well aware of the squalor of the material and doesn't give the viewer a chance to realize this fact, bombarding them with one stylized shot after another and with main characters so interesting that it's hard to believe. (03/09/2007)

When it premiered, I gave Payback 4 stars and I must admit with a certain blush that it charmed me in its own way - and I am not a fan of the genre or even Mel Gibson. It is a film made with ease and it is straightforward, simple, genre-pure, and a cool ride where the pace never slackens and the usual clichés are presented tastefully and with a pervasive sense of irony. On the other hand, as the years went by and I read the book, it impressed me much more with its darkness, complexity, and ambiguity. Besides, it is impossible not to notice how the film approaches the character of the violent, murderous, and thieving protagonist, presenting him to the viewer as a likable rascal. This story is hard to believe, and I left behind my teenage years when I would have identified with this portrayal a long time ago. Overall impression: 60%. (05/27/2020)