Closer

When a relationship is a personal threat and the thought of a more serious commitment suddenly becomes unpleasant. Mike Nichols knows how to implant an unbearable bug of uncertainty and ignorance about the people you love, thus sounding the alarm about the purpose of their search. Sometimes you simply don't want to know everything about the other person, and only at the eleventh hour will you realize the key aspect behind your emotions – the mystery of the other. And then it's too late to avoid all the cruelties because no matter what you say now, nothing will ever be the same. You will lose yourself and yet still be close. Closer – but still not there. An emotional mess, but cinematic perfection. (07/17/2005)

For me it was disappointing. Nichols shoots beautifully and the actors give their all to their roles, but the script shows almost no attempt at a deeply dramatic epic or plot loop. The characters swim in an ocean of titillating sexual fantasy, but the average viewer sort of stands on the shore and hopes to at least drool over a naked Queen Padmé or Pretty Woman, but we never get that, unfortunately, even though Natalie has a lot of talent as a stripper. (08/16/2017)

For a Hollywood film with a mainstream A-list cast, Closer is quite daring in its themes, language and depiction of sexuality. The central quartet of actors do a brilliant job, and Clive Owen in particular thoroughly enjoys his part and gives an excellent performance. I was a little put off by the fact that, with its running time and looping plot, the film, particularly in the second half, feels slightly repetitive and the jumps in time are often quite brutal. A well done dramatic chore, but I could imagine it being even more polished. [KVIFF 2024] (07/07/2024)

A soap opera for discerning viewers. Provocative, impudent, sleazy, artfully filmed (with respect to the possibilities of the interior sets) and, mainly, fantastically acted. Love, deceit, intrigue, revenge. But there is a little too much of that in the last third – a bit of detached humor would have helped. (03/23/2005)

Sexually open, but not explicit (on a verbal level only). The acting quartet is impressive, the individual actors remarkably type-matched to their characters, and the overall performance comes across as a little over-the-top in places, but impressive theatrically. Some of the dialogue is very peppy, but there’s a good deal of justification in its bluntness and crudeness if you can identify with the individual characters and empathize with their feelings, at least for a moment. A cruel, cynical, and very enlightening drama with excellent directing and outstanding performances. My first Mike Nichols. (09/28/2011)