Directed by:
Darren Lynn BousmanCinematography:
David A. ArmstrongComposer:
Charlie ClouserCast:
Tobin Bell, Shawnee Smith, Donnie Wahlberg, Erik Knudsen, Franky G, Glenn Plummer, Emmanuelle Vaugier, Beverley Mitchell, Dina Meyer, Lyriq Bent, Noam Jenkins (more)VOD (5)
Plots(1)
SAW II finds Jigsaw playing two games simultaneously: one involving eight victims who wake up in a crumbling house and must solve their mastermind’s riddle before their insides are destroyed by poison; and the other with Detective Eric Matthews (Donnie Wahlberg), whose rebellious son is among the eight captives. Also among the abducted is Amanda (Shawnee Smith), who was introduced in SAW as the only victim to have survived Jigsaw’s tests. Desperate to save his son, Detective Matthews resorts, not for the first time, to brutality and trickery. It’s a decision that leads him right into a trap designed by Jigsaw in collaboration with his new apprentice: Amanda. (official distributor synopsis)
(more)Videos (1)
Reviews (7)
No matter how problematic the first installment was, its originality couldn't be denied. The sequel, however, is about something else entirely. I wasn't interested in the contrived victim storyline at all this time, instead I was annoyed that it took away most of the attention from the trapped Jigsaw. His word games and precise cat-and-mouse game far surpass the events in the house, where people behave like lunatics, disregarding all warnings and diving headfirst into suspicious situations without any thought of elaborate traps. It's just a shame that, even though the twist can take your breath away, it takes away a lot of the momentum from the previous events. While tension and surprises shouldn't be forgotten, logic is completely disregarded.
()
The second movie didn't hit the right note for me. Unfortunately. I see the main problem as the directing style of Darren Lynn Bousman. The choppiness with really crazy editing sometimes makes your eyes hurt. But even the story itself didn't manage to hook me the way I would ideally have hoped. The acting was probably okay, and Donnie Wahlberg was a pleasant surprise. At least the climactic ending worked for the creators (that's something the Saw series can do). But otherwise, it's a weaker addition to this saga. I give it a 4/10.
()
In a way, Saw II is a pleasant surprise. The screenwriters managed to get rid of the holes in the logic in the first film, although it is true that they did leave a few of them in. In many ways, the filmmakers also managed to get away from the overly uneven parts, where one depicting the action in the room was excellent, with the others taking place elsewhere and the flashbacks being dull and grey. They manage to keep the atmosphere fairly balanced, though admittedly the whole thing is built more or less on a largely uncovered depiction of the functionality of the various tasks Jigsaw hands out to his victims. It is true that their originality is at times unpleasantly chilling, and some of them (the hole full of syringes) even made my stomach turn. Even so, Saw II is just a template thriller that has a relatively decent number of ideas and a decently dark atmosphere. On the other hand, it is also true that the hyperactive camera and clippy editing surprisingly take away from it a bit. A (non)standard above average film.
()
It’s already noticeably lacking the element of surprise that James Wan successfully pulled off in the suspenseful and psychologically charged first film. Everything is much more focused on the traps themselves, the story is brisker and bolder, and it follows the fate of the people trapped in the deadly labyrinth much more closely. If we look at it as a film on its own, it's not bad at all; Bousman put the story on the back burner a bit to focus mainly on what horror viewers want to see the most, but he still managed to make a very decent B-movie that is not marred by a more detailed depiction of human suffering. However, if we take the series into account, it is clear that the second part, like all the following ones, was made exclusively for profit, that it hardly develops the story, and that the only thing it has in common with the first one is the character of the killer and his principles. It's quite a shame that from this point onwards the Saw phenomenon would become not much more than brutal entertainment for teenagers, and the great story and atmosphere of the first episode can only be sadly remembered. The second one works, it has quite a lot to offer and has the advantage that it follows its famous predecessor, but I’d rather to avoid further parts just in case. 65%
()
Saw IIis a bit of a drop in quality compared to the almost genius first film, but that's just how it goes. There's a lot of emphasis on making everything look gritty, some characters are very stereotypical, and the main detective is incredibly unlikeable, but the finale still shows that the creators can lead us on brilliantly. The twist still works quite well here, and you find yourself looking forward to what's yet to come.
()
Ads