Directed by:
Mathieu KassovitzCinematography:
Thierry ArbogastComposer:
Bruno CoulaisCast:
Jean Reno, Vincent Cassel, Nadia Fares, Dominique Sanda, Karim Belkhadra, Jean-Pierre Cassel, Didier Flamand, François Levantal, Francine Bergé (more)VOD (1)
Plots(1)
Two criminal investigations. The same day, 300 km apart, two policemen are given two very particular cases. Pierre Niemans (Jean Reno) is a man of experience, who has an infallible instinct in criminal affairs but hides painful fears. He travels to Guernon, a university town in the Alps where a violent murder took place. Yougn, sharp, and loner Max Kerkerian (Vincent Cassel), a former car thief who entered the police force through a love of danger, is investigating a desecrated graveyard at Sarzac at night, and in particular the grave of a child who disappeared twenty years before. As clues bring them together, the two investigations crash head-on. And the murders grow in number. The truth will outdo all theories, taking the two policemen to high altitudes, caught between icy heights and death's door. (official distributor synopsis)
(more)Videos (1)
Reviews (10)
It's not bad... In my opinion, Mathieu Kassovitz has managed to very decently dilute the classic action style of decent American editing and the classic French conversational detective story, whilst also not feeling as primly funny as the director of the second film, Olivier Dahan, when trying to evoke a dark atmosphere. Jean Reno and his partner Vincent Cassel get enough space, and Vincent only disappointed me with one thing... he is not as sympathetic as his book counterpart. And that is actually the problem of The Crimson Rivers. Compared to the book, they don't have even half the tension and secrets, the trick with murders comes too soon, and the characters spew the entire deduction at us in confusion in the middle of a car chase. Well, a film is not a book, we all know that, but the adaptation to the script just has a lot of issues... and the "spectacular" and amateurish finale is proof of that. In the book, the awkwardness is somehow lost, but here it hits us over the head mainly thanks to the absolute overacting by Nadia Fares... If you haven’t read the book, you will like The Crimson Rivers a lot, and if you have, you will be somewhat disappointed. But formally, everything is completely fine.
()
The first installment of a loose trilogy of crime thrillers associated with Jean Reno as an investigator of brutal crimes is still a relatively decent film, though the weaknesses that sank the following two sequels are already apparent. The screenplay is underdeveloped and clearly prioritizes flashy visuals and shocking revelations over logical consistency, taking evident inspiration from successful American thrillers, notably Se7en. The attempt to emulate Fincher's directorial style is evident in several specific scenes. The result is an uneven film with an awkward ending, but it still has several audience-appealing moments and a dark, though inconsistent, atmosphere. Overall impression: 55%.
()
An enjoyable old-school detective film. It may not surprise today, but it must have been shocking at the time. It evokes Se7en, so there's no shortage of morbid murders, the idea and motive of the killer are also quite unorthodox and pleasing. And when you add in the excellent shots in the mountains and the overall setting, plus a fine Jean Reno, it's a winner. It won't wow you, but it's just a good watch.
()
A perfectly dark atmosphere that can only be maintained until the evidence starts to emerge. Jean Reno and Vincent Cassel are great on their own, but even the chase with the killer through the apartment really tests your nerves. And yet as it starts to incorporate all the mystery elements everything starts to creak and groain, and after the snowy finale you end up with a bitter taste in your mouth.
()
Kassovitz successfully conveys the dark atmosphere, and Reno and Cassel are charismatic enough to pull the whole film off just fine. But there are some moments, or rather, entire scenes that are so blatantly ripped-off of Se7en that it’s almost embarrassing. The ending is also contrived and full of clichés. It’s a pity, without that it would have been a very good thriller.
()
Ads