The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus

Oh, the old fool... again, he forgets that for all the intoxicating gloss, veils and crazy shapes, the whole show sways precariously in an ocean of thought and narrative confusion. But can you be mad at him for it? You can, although The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus is levels above the botched film The Brothers Grimm. It’s him again - the whimsical, wasteful, restless child and a collage maker of the impossible... However, despite the excellent acting, his last work is one of his lesser films. However, I cannot hide the fact that this quality is still damn good compared to others. (01/08/2010)

Nothing against an orgy of the wide-ranging imaginative, but you can't forget to tell a story. Terry Gilliam stubbornly creates "in his own way" to the point where his regularly repeated formula of an ending that flies in the face of most usual rules that it's starting slowly but surely to irritate me. The inventive first hour and the likable main characters against the backdrop of the right mystical plot are wasted when it starts to get entangled, change sides, and overturn archetypes. I can understand why such surprises are successful with the audience, but there was no great cinematic experience on my end, despite multiple great acting performances by Heath Ledger and his alter-ego a.k.a. the beauty Lily Cole. (04/30/2010)

It's Gilliam's full-field fantasy that made a virtue out of a necessity (Depp, Law, Farrell), and while there’s really nothing to fault it for, it's not something absolutely worth loving. Rather, it’s "just" a marionette adorned with colorful ribbons in the hands of an aging yet solid puppeteer. 4 ½. (02/01/2010)

What this film can't be denied is its utterly unrivalled originality. Some passages were so crazy and nonsensical at times that I believed them all the more. I have no words for the cast - they were a pleasure to watch. There were moments when I just marveled at the imagination of the creators. The film has great alternating scenes full of colour and bleakness and overall a steady balance. In short, it's basically a huge blizzard of imaginative figments of fantasy, full of "visual orgies" that cyclically builds and culminates in a rather surprising ending for me. (04/22/2010)

I treated myself to another viewing of a film I saw years ago when my world was still all right. It only confirmed my belief that Terry Gilliam is a true visual artist. Admittedly, I wasn't looking forward to rewatching it, remembering that the story went slightly over my head. It turns out that I just needed to age for it like fine liquor. Nothing threw me off, confused me, or annoyed me this time, and I could enjoy this fantastic, wild ex-Python ride to the fullest without being distracted by a lot of unanswered questions. If the casting of four actors as Tony hadn't been a bare necessity and a last-ditch move, it would still have been a great idea, perfectly suited for this wacky film. My personal favorite was Tom Waits as Mr. Nick. It was a weird film, no question about it, but if you know Terry Gilliam's work, you know that it could have been a lot more bizarre. I simply had to increase my rating after all these years. / Lesson learned: I strongly don't recommend gambling with the Devil. (10/22/2022)