Directed by:
Laurent TirardCinematography:
Denis RoudenComposer:
Klaus BadeltCast:
Maxime Godart, Valérie Lemercier, Kad Merad, Sandrine Kiberlain, François-Xavier Demaison, Michel Duchaussoy, Daniel Prévost, Michel Galabru (more)Plots(1)
Nicholas leads a peaceful existence. He has parents who love him, a gang of terrific friends to play with, and no desire for anything to change. But one day, Nicholas overhears a conversation between his parents which leads him to believe that his mother is expecting a child. He panics and imagines the worst: a little brother! Nicholas’ parents will no longer have time for him. Maybe they'll even abandon him in the forest like Little Tom Thumb. To escape this disastrous fate, Nicholas embarks on a full-scale campaign to make himself indispensable to his parents. But by trying too hard, he only piles up blunder after blunder and provokes their anger. Desperate, he decides to change tactics. After all, it's not up to him to leave. He was there first. It's the baby who should disappear. Nicholas and his pals come up with all kinds of plans - plans that lead them into increasingly zany misadventures. Unaware of the risks they are taking, the kids wreak havoc throughout the entire town. But just when they think they've found the solution, Nicholas sees a friend whose mother has just had a baby and who describes all the positive aspects of being a big brother. It doesn't sound too bad at all to Nicholas. Transformed, he runs home and tells his parents he's delighted to have a little brother. When they explain that there's been a misunderstanding, he starts to cry and reproaches them for never wanting to make him happy. But one last surprise awaits our hero... (Wild Bunch Distribution)
(more)Videos (4)
Reviews (6)
It works as an ordinary children's film, but hardly as a treatment of the infinitely poetic and kind world of the Goscinny-Sempé duo. It is too bad that the creators are stuck halfway between stylization and civility. In this way, the impression persists that Little Nicholas would function much better as a cartoon character... The French essentially failed to do with the children's storyline what the creators of the Czech series We Were a Handful were able to do – to find a balance between the infantile and film language. In any case, Little Nicholas’s inconveniences don’t tend to offend, not even someone who grew up watching the show and is still one of its uncritical fans.
()
A beautiful example of how it's possible to make a comedy in modern times that captures the spirit of perhaps the first half of the last century, yet still manages to thoroughly entertain contemporary audiences, regardless of the viewer's age. Little Nicholas, based on a classic work of French modern literature, is a comedy suitable for essentially all generations, but especially for those who want to have a good laugh.
()
There was a time when I didn't go anywhere without a book about "Little Nicholas" in my hand. Those days are long gone, but Little Nicolas still has a special place in my heart. And so I didn't expect much from the adaptation. But I was mistaken. The adaptation is both unusually successful and, at the same time, unique. A pure embodiment of non-infantile family entertainment, which will often get more laughs from adults than from kids. Moreover, Nicholas’ misadventures in both forms have the special power to return you to your childhood, which is something that very few books and even fewer movies are able to do. And the fact that the film doesn’t compare to the original is not so relevant in this case, because I didn't even realize it until loooooong after I left the movie theater and had wiped away the last tears of laughter.
()
Little Nicholas will surely evoke mixed feelings in certain viewers, who are also enthusiastic readers of the well-known book series with this character, just as it is common in film adaptations of bestsellers. Film is simply a different medium and the book cannot be mechanically transferred onto the movie screen. Something will be omitted, something will be altered, and above all, the film as a visual art concretizes what literature works with imagination. On the other hand, from my perspective, the film turned out better than expected and it became a very decent family spectacle that has a chance to appeal to all generations. René Goscinny has written a series of books and the screenwriter and director had to fit their ideas into a single film. It is, of course, possible to perceive the film as a continuous sequence of gags and catchphrases, but this more sober approach suits it better. The acting is very good, and there is no overacting and there are plenty of comedic situations. The used stylization is civil, not the bombastic style we know from American productions. Overall impression: 90%.
()
A great transfer of legendary books to the silver screen. The child and adult actors are well chosen and the familiar scenes are irresistible in their performances, the script is beautifully childish and naive and the whole film, stylized in attractive retro colors, looks nice... Little Nicholas was as good as it could be, and it couldn't have been any better. It will be enjoyed by young and old alike, and that's the way it should be. I give major bonus points for the great music by Klaus Badelt.
()
Ads