I, Frankenstein

I love action romps, I'm a big fan of them, especially Underworld: Awakening, I managed to reach five orgasms there, but when I say this is a really bad movie, I'm still flattering it. Mediocre visual effects, uninteresting action, a story written by a 12 year old kid. This is a disgrace to all action movies!! Stuart Beattie owes me 92 minutes of my life. A waste of time I wouldn't recommend even to my worst enemy. (03/07/2014)

It’s been a long time since I saw so stupid that I wasn’t impressed by a single thing. Even the effects aren't worth mentioning, let alone praising. Those 49 CZK for the DVD were too much. (03/11/2015)

Predictable, emotionally boring with empty characters, where at first glance it's clear how each person will behave. I don't know if this shows that the casting was done amazingly or simply because they took traditionally typecast actors. I think this is more of a joke on the audience, a test to see what they can still handle and how many times. Action horrors were doing quite well recently, so why not copy a ten-year-old idea and try it again. Well, it didn't work out according to the box office. The reference to Mary Shelley's work here is rather mocking. (03/12/2014)

Miserably filmed idiocy where ugly stone monkeys call the beefy Eckhart a monster. The war between ugly gargoyles and ridiculous demons couldn’t have been made duller. Poor special effects, boring action and, most importantly, confused story are the qualities of this "homage" to the Underworld franchise. (05/04/2018)