I, Frankenstein

Miserably filmed idiocy where ugly stone monkeys call the beefy Eckhart a monster. The war between ugly gargoyles and ridiculous demons couldn’t have been made duller. Poor special effects, boring action and, most importantly, confused story are the qualities of this "homage" to the Underworld franchise. (05/04/2018)

I love action romps, I'm a big fan of them, especially Underworld: Awakening, I managed to reach five orgasms there, but when I say this is a really bad movie, I'm still flattering it. Mediocre visual effects, uninteresting action, a story written by a 12 year old kid. This is a disgrace to all action movies!! Stuart Beattie owes me 92 minutes of my life. A waste of time I wouldn't recommend even to my worst enemy. (03/07/2014)

It’s been a long time since I saw so stupid that I wasn’t impressed by a single thing. Even the effects aren't worth mentioning, let alone praising. Those 49 CZK for the DVD were too much. (03/11/2015)

Predictable, emotionally dull with empty characters where you can tell at first glance how each one will behave. I don't know if this shows that the casting was done brilliantly or if they just went with traditionally typecast actors. I think this is more like a joke on the audience, a test of how much they can handle and how many times. Action-horror films have been quite popular lately, so why not copy a ten-year-old idea and try it again? Well, it didn't quite work out according to the revenues from the film. The reference to Mary Shelley's work here seems more like a mockery. (03/12/2014)