Avatar: The Way of Water

Avatar: The Way of Water has the screenwriting of a mediocre television series that’s not in any hurry to get anywhere. Not only can the story again be summed up in a single short sentence, but it’s the same as the last time and it looks like the next one won’t be any different. The unnatural movement of the blue lizards on dry land hasn’t changed since the “pilot”, so the first half of the film comes across like a video-game demo. Transitioning to the world under water is thus a tremendous upgrade. The lizards swim much more elegantly than they walk and jump, and James Cameron breathes extraordinary life into the fictional undersea plants and animals. It is beautiful and enchanting.  Luc Besson will be pleased. The human characters are also given space on the water, thus giving the digital artifice a more physical sense of drive. All of those submarines, mecha crabs and wicked scenes of “whale” hunting are uber cool, reminiscent of the action treats in Waterworld. Overall, however, the Avatar phenomenon becomes rather more of an amusement-park attraction (with the promise of a VR future) than a cinematic work in the true sense of the word. It’s kind of like Cameron’s version of a Marvel flick, but with poor character development, which is a bit of a shame. (12/14/2022)

James Cameron once again shows Hollywood who is the king of blockbuster movies. Despite its three-hour running time, Avatar 2 is entertaining from beginning to end, with breathtaking audiovisual and personal stories of old and new heroes at the ideal pace. Pandora is perhaps even more beautiful than last time, the newcomers are likeable, and Cameron keeps the pace from start to finish without a single flinch. And after thirteen years, he shows that he's still a long way ahead of most Hollywood filmmakers. (12/14/2022)

There were a few sequences that reminded me of an expensive video game, and I can't decide how much I actually liked the 3D – on the one hand it's immersive, but on the other it leads your attention too much by refocusing and prevents you from enjoying large units with many action layers. Otherwise, no complaints. The first had more action, the second has more well-knit relationships between the characters and deepens the transcendent connection to a fictional world that blossoms before your eyes in splendour beyond the highest expectations. This is how you tell a story and dazzle with an image. I enjoy Pandora and its exploration tied to innocent childhood curiosity, I enjoy the altered eco-message and the technological megalomania that ensures a truly unprecedented immersion. This is where the future of cinema is being shaped, without forgetting the story, which I personally found quite different and more intimate than last time. And I can't wait to see where Quaritch's (again, the best character) blind conquest syndrome and personal vendetta will turn next. (12/15/2022)

Less water, man, less water! I’m still a big fan of the first Avatar, which worked like a euphoric trip through another world thanks to its simple narrative structure involving a hero/outsider savior of the noble savages. The second one is essentially a drawn-out and shaky soap opera about a family run by a militant father who moves to a new ’hood and can’t get used to it. Let’s leave aside that Cameron paid significantly less attention to dramatic motivations than he did to the last fish below the surface. The whole film thus seems irrational and the dialogue, which was never Avatar’s strength, is even more ear-scratchingly pedantic. As an epic tech reel, however, the film is breathtaking and I truly, royally enjoyed the underwater National Geographic in HFR. There is something truly intoxicating in the smoothness and fluidity. Unfortunately, the film’s 192 minutes are emotionally stolen by a crippled humpback whale, which has the significant advantage that it doesn’t talk (and even its retrospective is not told smoothly). Yes, Cameron is a great craftsman and illusionist, but as a storyteller, he fails here significantly in my opinion. There is no development of the mythology to speak of, as everything is just a variation, the metaphor of nature as a loving entity is becoming more and more naïve and, honestly, I would like to spend less time waiting for the third one and the fire people after this aquatherapy. During the screening, I found it difficult to push away the thought that I would have preferred to enjoy some top-quality sci-fi, which Avatar decidedly isn’t! (01/02/2023)

I tried to resist, but eventually, I gave in and watched the second Avatar movie. I had to break it into three sittings because of its length. As expected, it's visually stunning — leagues ahead of anything else in the film industry right now and probably for years to come. However, the visuals overshadow everything else. The acting feels almost nonexistent since it's essentially an animated film. Plus, it’s only truly impressive in a theater setting. Story-wise, the first hour is a slog, but things pick up once James introduces us to a new tribe on Pandora, adding some interest to the typical blockbuster narrative. If it weren't so long, I'd have fonder memories of it. Honestly, if James keeps churning out similar tales from Pandora, he might just end up boring the audience. We'll see. (09/30/2023)