Plots(1)

A supernatural thriller driven by fantasy, mystery, and romance, Horns follows Ig Perrish (Daniel Radcliffe), the number one suspect for the murder of his girlfriend, Merrin (Juno Temple). Hungover from a night of hard drinking, Ig awakens one morning to find horns growing from his head and soon realizes their power drives people to confess their sins and give in to their most selfish and unspeakable impulses an effective tool in his quest to discover what happened to his girlfriend and exact revenge on her killer. (Anchor Bay Entertainment)

(more)

Videos (3)

Trailer 3

Reviews (10)

3DD!3 

all reviews of this user

English Absolute psycho that often goes way over the top, but I enjoyed it more than part 1. The fact that it’s a sequel is capitalized upon and so everything is bigger, more explosive and the humor even crazier. Miller and Lord thrive on knick-knacks, antiracism and also... on male comradery. Awesome final credits. ()

RUSSELL 

all reviews of this user

English I watched the movie right after finishing the book, which I loved, and it only amplified my excitement for Horns. The plot is understandably condensed and simplified to fit the film format, but Aja did an excellent job. He managed to extract all the essential elements from the book, added new material, and crafted a delightful treat that stands proudly beside its incredible literary counterpart while offering something unique on its own. Aja's previous films are known for their brutality and gore, and while there's less of that here, the moments that do include it are impactful. The CGI effects are well done and seamlessly integrated into the story. When I saw Juno Temple cast as Merrin, I was worried I wouldn't get the fiery redhead described in the book, but thankfully they dyed her hair, and she perfectly embodied the beautiful Merrin I imagined. It's easy to see why Ig fell in love with her at first sight. I was slightly disappointed that Lee's character wasn't portrayed in the film as the deeply twisted and deceitful person he was in the book. I was looking forward to the scenes where he tortures his dying mother for months, but those were left out. The flashbacks to their youth were also shortened and simplified, but that’s understandable given the constraints of film runtime. Overall, I'm thrilled with how the movie turned out. It includes everything necessary, even the scene with the snake slithering into the throat. This is how you successfully adapt a book to the big screen. Aja nailed it! ()

Ads

gudaulin 

all reviews of this user

English I never saw Horns during its premiere, and I was disappointed about that. The idea of exposing a person to brutal social pressure and mental suffering to such an extent that they are unable to bear it in a rational way and unwillingly transform into a supernatural being from another (dark) world was already masterfully portrayed by Bulgakov in "The Master and Margarita." In my opinion, such a concept has great potential, but the director and screenwriter managed to completely squander it through their hard work. In many comments, Daniel Radcliffe's involvement in the main role is discussed. Although his performance is not Oscar-worthy, it didn't bother me, and his presence eventually became one of the few positives that can be said about HornsHorns could have been many things, ranging from dark fantasy to a horror comedy (let's remember how excellently The Witches of Eastwick turned out). Instead, Alexandre Aja created a didactic morality tale full of sentiment, permeated with religious symbolism, and using the most clichéd genre tropes. I could partially forgive him for that if he hadn't been so literal and pathetic, and if he had been more sophisticated and imaginative. This is a disappointment. Overall impression: 25%. ()

kaylin 

all reviews of this user

English Merrin becomes just a shadow of her book counterpart, and not even Juno Temple can save it. Daniel Radcliffe shows that he is a capable actor who is willing to shed his British accent to give everything to the role. He's more than bearable, and even though I initially thought he was a bad choice, I was ultimately satisfied. I was less satisfied with the excessive use of CGI effects and the fact that Alexandre Aja couldn't extract true horror from the book adaptation. ()

Malarkey 

all reviews of this user

English Daniel Radcliffe wants to free himself from his fateful character so much that I feel like since the end of the Harry Potter saga, he deliberately only takes roles of characters that are crazy or not quite alright. Good for him. So far, it has paid off without an issue. Horns is a fantasy crime investigation movie that abstractly tells the story of a murder. I admit that without thehorns, it would be a classic crime investigation, but it’s all the more fun with them because I’ve never seen such an idea before. What’s more, it is filmed in such a clever way that there can be no talk of a B-grade movie. I have to say – it really made me happy. ()

Gallery (103)