Plots(1)

Deep under the Arctic Ocean, American submarine Captain Joe Glass (Gerard Butler) is on the hunt for a U.S. sub in distress when he discovers a secret Russian coup is in the offing, threatening to dismantle the world order. With crew and country on the line, Captain Glass must now assemble an elite group of Navy SEALs to rescue the kidnapped Russian president and sneak through enemy waters to stop WWIII. (Lionsgate UK)

(more)

Videos (8)

Trailer 2

Reviews (9)

D.Moore 

all reviews of this user

English This at least could have used a better director and special effects that didn't look like a video game, since the script is so ridiculous and the actors are boring (definitely don't watch Hunter Killer because of Gary Oldman, you'll be disappointed). This game didn't work out for Tom Clancy. ()

Othello 

all reviews of this user

English Well there you go, they did quietly make a Call of Duty movie after all. All they had to do was change the name, use Beaman instead of Captain Price, Martinelli instead of Soap, and that was it. Otherwise, it's got all the ingredients I'd expect from a film adaptation of that militant franchise. There are the changes of viewpoint, where one day we're in a nuclear submarine in the midst of a minefield, another time a sniper shielding his buddies, and yet another time a member of a special forces unit out to rescue the President. We run into iconic sequences from the video game series, such as wildly sliding down a concrete slope on your ass, an opening shooting warm-up with fake targets and a time limit, or a camera zooming out of the ground into the stratosphere where a military drone is on the prowl. So, too, does it retain the detached psychology of the characters, where you know almost nothing beyond the conflict (and the film self-consciously hints at this sympathetically a couple of times), and the distrust of the meritorious high command that the guys in the field have to defy at the right moment in order to do the right thing. Like the entire Call of Duty franchise, Hunter Killer is mainly an army-fetishistic, macho, and idiotic story that is irresistibly entertaining from start to finish. ()

Ads

Marigold 

all reviews of this user

English Why Gary Oldman accepted the role of Dick Cheney in this C-movie is as much of a mystery as what Andrej junior did in Crimea. Sometimes he gives the impression that he was walking around and put on his uniform, then he just commented on something, shook a hand and fucked off. Gerard Butler has already made a living out of this boyish parody, so his macho, homoerotic etudes are actually doing me good. What they lack is a real scoundrel played by Michael Nyqvist, to whom Putin should give citizenship. He's the Russian. What now? TV Barrandov buys these types of films, but the effects are worse. The Russians speak broken Russian for a while, then broken English for a while. Toby Stephens wandered somewhere in Benghazi and found himself on the set in Poljarny. The screenplay was written by Tom Clancy's demented brother, and Donovan Marsh has a unique feel for ugly green screens, and Gareth Edward openly robs Godzilla in one scene. In any case, it is a film where submarines dive, emerge, pass rocks on a razor’s edge and endure a depth charge. I can't give the film less than three stars, because if I omit the lethargic middle, it's actually fun bullshit that gradually develops a 90's mentality. ()

EvilPhoEniX 

all reviews of this user

English I wasn't impressed by the trailer and I admire submarines, but I don't really like movies on this topic, so in the end I'm very pleasantly surprised by how brisk and entertaining Hunter Killer is. Gerard Butler is solid as the captain and I enjoyed the underwater attacks, which are very suspenseful though rather mediocrely filmed. The rescue of the Russian President was also good. I enjoyed myself immensely and didn't expect more here. I can't remember a more entertaining submarine movie, I'll gladly round up. 70% ()

agentmiky 

all reviews of this user

English I was expecting more, I admit. Based on the trailers, I was preparing for a real mess where nothing would make sense, but at least it would offer a decent amount of fun and suspense. There were inconsistencies, which didn’t bother me, but I thought the film wasn’t as action-packed as it could have been. There were almost no practical effects; it was entirely reliant on the skill of a computer expert, who created the final digital look using various programs. Honestly, with a few exceptions, it didn’t sit well with me because it felt too artificial. Gerard Butler suited the role, but his monotonous expression drove me to madness by the end. It seemed like he wasn’t really into it. And Oldman didn’t deserve such a small role; he didn’t have much space to show what he could do, but it’s hard to blame him for that. The shootouts were okay, they saved the film to some extent. By the end, the creators seemed unsure how to wrap it up sensibly, so they made it a big mix. But how can you actually save a film where the main plot involves Americans saving the Russian president? I’d understand it from the mind of a six-year-old, but not like this. It’s a bit over the top. While I used to enjoy films like this, I’ve been finding them less appealing lately. I give it 48%. ()

Gallery (35)