Amores Perros

A pretty decent film, a kind of alternative to Pulp Fiction. I'm probably repeating myself a lot, but I can't help it. I agree with what a lot of users have said here, that is a film that builds up for the first hour or so and then its charm, suspense and emotion sinks like the Titanic to the bottom of the sea. It tries to catch its breath at the end, but it really doesn't do it very well. Of the stories, the weakest was probably the middle one with the obnoxious model and the best, as I said, was the first (the dogfight). Decent as a whole in itself, as was the interweaving and continuity of the stories. All in all, if I add and subtract at the end, it comes out to about 70-75%. The missing percentages are for the second story and partly for the third. But either way I recommend this film to watch and think about. (09/08/2009)

Just like Denmark has Lars Von Trier and Sweden has Lasse Hallström, Mexican cinema also has its number one: Alejandro Gonzalez Iñárritu. He has maintained his directorial style even in Hollywood, and that was the key to his success. But here it bothered me with an excessive running time. The technical execution, on the other hand, it's a blast again. (01/07/2005)

Iñárritu has directing down to a science again, interweaving a trio of intricate stories with such dexterity as if he's been doing nothing but running with a camera through the urban jungle since birth. I can only point out to two big weaknesses in this outing, namely that he plays too much for effect in some places, giving up his captivating authenticity as a result, and then things get quite boring at the end and, due to the exorbitant runtime, there’s nothing that would break the viewer out of their lethargy. I liked the first two stories and generally enjoyed how beautifully everything was working out for Alejandro, but on the other hand I was very disappointed that the most interesting passage about the hitman went completely to waste, as did the attempt at emotional softening at the end. It's a very good film no doubt, probably worth the 150 minutes, but nothing groundbreaking or outright unusual. At least it showed what an untouchable ruler Pulp Fiction is in this circle of films. 75% (06/25/2013)

I’ve grown suspiciously fond of the type of films where various individual storylines intersect at one point. I enjoyed the film even twenty years after its creation, not even noticing its terrifyingly long runtime. I wasn't bored at all, only my original excitement was replaced by a much more sober approach (well, technically, I was sober even the first time I saw it). (10/30/2020)

A great film that initially seems like it couldn't be about love at all, but in reality, it's love that drives all the characters into situations that are very tragic for them, or at least for someone else. An incredibly powerful film that, even after years, shows me that those first impressions don't fade but keep repeating. (12/18/2014)