Plots(1)

When young Laurent returns to exotic St. Tropez, he bears big news for his beloved father, Renato. Laurent has found the girl of his dreams and they are engaged! What's more, she and her family are on their way over for dinner at Renato's home to meet the in-laws-to-be. This traditional meeting of families seems typical, but because this ultraconservative family will be expecting to meet Renato and wife, they'll never be prepared for the shock of meeting Renato and his flamboyant, campy, outrageous loverand dragqueenAlbin! So in agreat effort to please his son, Renato asks Albin for the performance of a lifetime'setting up an unforgettable evening that is charged and ready to detonate an explosion of zaniness and absurdity. (official distributor synopsis)

(more)

Reviews (3)

Prioritize:

angel74 

all reviews of this user

English Watching the successful American remake, The Birdcage, I had a lot more fun. Probably because I watched it before La Cage aux Folles, so I didn't know what I was getting into, and also Robin Williams, Nathan Lane and Gene Hackman absolutely thrilled me with the approaches to their roles. This is not to throw dirt on the performances of Ugo Tognazzi, Michel Serrault and Michel Galabru. All three tried their best and played very well. (65%) ()

Malarkey 

all reviews of this user

English Out of respect for French comedies, I decided to give La Cage aux Folles a try. The plot surprised me quite a bit in the first few minutes. I can only imagine how groundbreaking this must have been back in the day; nowadays, it doesn't raise many eyebrows. It's a shame Michel Galabru, the reason I watched the film, wasn't featured more. Whenever he was on screen, you could feel that classic French comedic flair. The last half hour was phenomenal, though. Up until then, it felt a bit weaker compared to other French comedies. Still, the Saint-Tropez setting was a delight and often reminded me of the Gendarme series. ()

gudaulin 

all reviews of this user

English The film benefits from a strong cast and, naturally, from a very famous theatrical source. However, I feel that the film has somewhat aged, and its weakness lies in that it parasites off the themes of homosexuality and transvestism, where the actors overact, grimace, and babble exactly according to the most foolish social prejudices. This might be tolerable in theater, but the film screen demands a bit more restrained acting. My rating is understandably influenced by my knowledge of the theatrical source; I saw this play and enjoyed it more on stage. Overall impression: 65%. ()