Directed by:
Peter WeirCinematography:
Russell BoydCast:
Russell Crowe, Paul Bettany, Billy Boyd, James D'Arcy, Edward Woodall, Chris Larkin, Max Pirkis, Jack Randall, Max Benitz, Lee Ingleby, David Threlfall (more)VOD (3)
Plots(1)
When a sudden attack by a French warship inflicts casualties and severe damage upon his vessel, Captain "Lucky" Jack Aubrey (Crowe) of the British Royal Navy is torn between duty and friendship as he embarks on a thrilling, high-stakes chase across two oceans to intercept and capture the enemy at any cost. (20th Century Fox UK)
Videos (2)
Reviews (11)
I can't remember the last time I found out before the movie climaxed that I had barely been breathing. It had to be a long time ago, and it had to be for a movie similar to Master and Commander. This is a wonderful callback to old times, robust filmmaking with a clear vision, precise leadership and superbly put together dramatic layers. Peter Weir has commanding skills and the steadfastness of captain Jack, but he also remains an analytical observer like Dr. Stephen. The way individual characters are built, and the way chemistry is maintained by the crew, should be in a cinematic tactics textbook. In a few minutes, a person is on board and participates in a cruise that is both informative, exciting and emotional. Moreover, Weir's typical dualities of small and large universes are reflected here, when war, politics, and science are all reflected in the relationships and conversations of the characters, without the film sliding into any exaggerated philosophizing. Everything's just right, and the dust won't get wet despite the thunderous runtime. This blew off my main mast. Huzzah! (and the second part, from what Peter Weir told us, is not utopia).
()
Whatever you might expect, you will get something else. Master & Commander is like a James Ivory film on the water. There’s no epic story, no action, no grand heroes. The film is rather a psychological excursion into the lives of the crew of an old warship, their interpersonal conflicts and the rules that they have to follow. The brightest scene in a war movie would be a successful final battle. In this film, it’s an insect collection belonging to a wounded doctor on a tropical island. The cinematography is beautiful, portraying the individual characters in dozens of detailed nuances. Russell Crowe appears on the screen and you immediately idolize him. And you form a relationship with the other main characters as if you have known them for years. Peter Weir is an extraordinary director.
()
A perfect combination of artsy chamber piece focused on characters and “how things worked on those beautiful vessels with sails" with a simple adventure for boys about friendship and duties like out of a dime novel you read secretly during lessons. Despite having nothing whatsoever to do with the equally marvelous book the movie is based on (this is more a mixture of the first and third book with a bit from the tenth book in the Aubrey and Maturin series), this is a simply wonderful movie in its sense for historical precision, characterization of characters or nods for readers (Jack’s missing earlobe, letters to Sophia, Maturin’s “floral" waistcoat etc.) And technical aspects keep step with the content - they are the highest possible standard. The only thing that disappoints me is the non-existence of a director’s cut. As a whole twenty-four minutes of cut scenes demonstrates, not just ballast, but much high quality material was left out of the final cut.
()
For a large part of its runtime, Master and Commander maintains an excellent five-star level of unconventional drama, which does without typical genre clichés and is characterized by a decent atmosphere. The director is not as interested in the war action as in depicting the life of a sailboat crew at the beginning of the 19th century, and through minor incidents and dialogues, the viewer learns a lot not only about a sailor's life but also about the whole society of that time. Among other things, it is a film about friendship and responsibility and a hierarchy of values. The final third of the film, which portrays the clash of two warships, is predictable, clichéd, and above all poorly shot, as well as fragmented, chaotic, and poorly edited. Peter Weir simply doesn't know how to do this, it's not his area of expertise. The culmination of the film for me was not the battle frenzy, but several dialogues between the captain and his ship's doctor. Overall impression: 80%. The film has an excellent cast, with Russell Crowe excelling in his role. In addition to the cast, the film's strengths include the authenticity of the setting and the cinematography, which utilizes all the possibilities that the ocean environment provides.
()
I can't even believe how sensitively such a one-sided issue can be portrayed. For two hours, I wanted to serve on the HMS Surprise under the perfect captain Russell Crowe and fight for England. It's a shame that the script can't match Peter Weir's fantastic directing and sometimes slips into completely unnecessary twists, like in the case of the superstition about Jonah.
()
Gallery (37)
Photo © 2003 20th Century Fox
![Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World - Making of](http://image.pmgstatic.com/cache/resized/w663/files/images/film/photos/160/163/160163208_79f6f6.jpg)
Ads