The Death of Stalin

House of Cards demonises politics as a rotten evil, the Danish government presents an explosive ideal of how politics should look, the classic satire Yes, Minister ridicules the incompetence and stubbornness of top politicians and the Czech Kancelář Blaník takes the blame off of politicians and depicts professionally depersonalised and opportunistic lobbyists as the instigators of all evil. This map, on which every viewer can choose which of these image of politics suits his or her prejudices or ideals, is essentially supplemented by the British satirist Armando Iannucci, who, unlike all the others, depicts politics as uncontrolled chaos. Thanks to this, he is characteristically able to include in his screenplays, with the phenomenal – and for many epigones, inspiring - political sitcom The Thick of It at the fore, all of the above-mentioned views on politics through individual characters. The initial situation of The Death of Stalin is exactly Iannucci's characteristic political chaos, not only in the sense of what started immediately after Stalin's death, but also in the sense of the entire degenerate totalitarian regime of the USSR of late Stalinism, where only incompetents, nutcases, toadies, manipulators and morons remained in high positions, because all of the capable people had been eliminated. (07/07/2019)

A completely awesome comedy, and what I like most is the fact that it’s not even a little idiotic. The film humorously talks about serious things without ridiculing or belittling them. The script is packed with tremendous jokes, the cast works together like clockwork (Steve Buscemi and Michael Palin were a safe bet, but when Jason Isaacs' Zhukov burst onto the scene, everything got even better) and not a single joke is left without a point. Hand on heart, the Russians would ban this film even if it wasn't a comedy and if it depicted everything literally and deadly seriously - but then I would certainly have no desire to see it again and again. And again. (04/17/2018)

Making fun of a scum like Stalin and the Bolshevik cadres deserves praise, but I didn't find the film very funny. The humour was quite forced and ham-fisted, I guess I'm not the right viewer for such unbridled shenanigans. The casting, with the exception of Khrushchev and Molotov (the always reliable Buscemi and Palin) was one big blunder, especially with Stalin himself, who came across more like a nice old man than the charismatic, demonic Satan. (04/27/2018)

I haven't seen Armando Iannucci's work, but after watching this madness (I mean that in a good way), I’ll have to make up for it. I haven't seen such a well-done situational comedy in a long time (it reminded me a lot of the Netflix satire Don't Look Up), though it’s worth noting that it has a considerable amount of dark humor and a lot of serious scenes where you might feel your blood running cold. The cast was absolutely perfect; everyone showed they are among the top acting talents (if I had to name one, it would be Steve Buscemi as Khrushchev). Jason Isaacs' arrival as Zhukov almost had me on the floor laughing. The film surprised me positively, with amazing work all around. Now that I think about it, it's quite difficult to talk about the film. Anyone who hasn’t seen this creation yet should correct that immediately and form their own opinion. For me, it’s a well-deserved 9/10. (04/13/2022)

To be honest, I wasn’t sure what to make of this film at first. It felt weird without Russian language, although I understand that it would be impossible. Some of the jokes didn’t work for me. Gradually, I started having fun, and by the time Zhukov arrived on the scene, I was laughing like crazy. The worst thing about the film was the casting of Stalin, which went horribly wrong and made Joseph Vissarionovich look like a parody of himself. By contrast, Robert Duvall was practically perfect in 1992 Stalin. (09/04/2018)