Composer:
Pedro BromfmanCast:
Pedro Pascal, Wagner Moura, Boyd Holbrook, Paulina Gaitan, Alberto Ammann, Raúl Méndez, Paulina García, Matias Varela, Diego Cataño, Julian Diaz (more)VOD (1)
Seasons(3) / Episodes(30)
Plots(1)
A chronicled look at the criminal exploits of Colombian drug lord Pablo Escobar. (official distributor synopsis)
Videos (8)
Reviews (12)
Could this be the most meticulously crafted series I’ve ever seen? Quite possibly. The first season of Narcos grips you like few things have before. I’ve never paid much attention to television productions, as they often don’t have the highest budgets, but Narcos defies those preconceived notions with every minute. It approaches the level of a blockbuster, and that’s an undeniable fact. The casting was spot-on. For the role of Escobar, a Latin American actor was a must, and with Wagner Moura on hand, who has the talent and a striking resemblance to the criminal, hesitation was not an option. Moura gave his all, and it showed. Even his gaze was deadly, reflecting the intense preparation he undertook for the role. The supporting roles were also excellently cast; you won’t find anyone who feels out of place. As a probe into the operations of drug lords and the underworld, it functions superbly. The atmosphere is palpable, everything is depicted with no restraints and boundaries, and it is simply authentic. At times, it felt like I was watching a documentary (though there was real, albeit quite dramatic, footage, it helped understand daily life in Colombia). The action scenes were also perfectly handled. I have nothing to criticize. I’m looking forward to the next season; a series about such a notorious criminal hasn’t been seen in a long time, and likely won’t be again soon. It’s definitely worth savoring. I’m giving it 96%.
()
The series became an instant favorite of mine. What makes me like it so much is how different it is from the standard. The creators managed to create an excellent, powerful atmosphere right from the first episode. They also did an excellent job regarding action and suspense. If it hadn't been for four somewhat awkward episodes in the second half of the second season, I would have practically nothing to complain about. And I can't even say those episodes were bad, I just got too spoiled by the perfection that precedes them. I really enjoyed Agent Murphy's commentary and the use of real footage, which gave the whole series more depth. I really enjoyed this show.
()
Character-driven, elaborate, personal, authentic, raw. A spectacular drug saga charting the 1980s and 90s in countries that were drug havens. A brilliant mix of semi-documentary and fiction. A little loose at times, of course, due to the number of episodes, but still dwarfing most of the competition in terms of content.
()
I guess, you will not find out what the problem (or more precisely the unpleasant snag) of this series is… It has two central lines. Drug dealers "South American" Spanish-speaking lines that is focused on the late career of the patron of the Medellin cartel Pablo Escobar (fantastic, respectful and, Mour that does not overplay at all), which is full of intrigue, tension, well built and adhering to genre specifics, without however, deviating significantly from reality (after all, there is no reason for that, because even the reality was sometimes hard to believe). The second DEA "North American" English-speaking story line is way too much procedural, addressing the details of the investigation (both agents were actively involved in the development of the series) and the hunt for the drug lord, who was one of the richest/most dangerous people of his time. You already know what the snag is, right? Yes, each story line is completely (but really completely) different. It cannot be said that one is better or worse than the other one, because their style, atmosphere and concept are so different that they are simply incompatible in many respects. In addition, there is a third component in the form of very frequent documentary sequences that are like a radio broadcast and are accompanied by archival then footage. Although each of the components works great independently and there is nothing to complain about (perhaps it just looks like each agency is represented only by one person), they do not fit together and do not form a coherent whole. Which, given their qualities, is rather a letdown. And it is even a bigger letdown since it has already been shown that these seemingly incompatible approaches to this topic can still be successfully combined (I mean Don Winslow). In other words, it is a disappointment, but it is certainly not something that would change the indisputable fact that Narcos has become one of the top shows in contemporary quality TV.
()
In the field of organized crime, there were many important players, but only one was the king. A man who declared war on his own country, but also the only private individual who ever challenged the United States of America to a duel. A man who, at the height of his fame, earned 5 billion dollars a year, and owned a private army including an air force and navy. A man who created a state within a state and paid a significant portion of state institutions. Pablo Escobar became a legend even during his lifetime. I remember that even behind the Iron Curtain in the 80s, fragmentary information about his exploits reached us. And although we lived with different problems on a different continent, Escobar was simply an unmistakable figure on a global scale. The most significant drug producer and dealer, a man who aspired to become the Colombian president, a megalomaniac, and a completely ruthless brutal murderer. Narcos is an exceptionally interesting work primarily because of the material it deals with. The life stories of Pablo Escobar and other members of the Medellín Cartel would be enough for several seasons of a TV series, and there would still be plenty to tell. This is actually the biggest problem with the series. It is too concise, and the majority of the characters remain at the level of figures. For me, the best series about organized crime remains Boardwalk Empire (although I haven't seen The Wire yet). Wagner Moura enjoys playing the role of Pablo Escobar, and José Padilha's direction is reliable and he feels right at home in the genre. The series has a significance for Latin America that we fully cannot realize in Europe. Pablo Escobar was loved and admired by the masses regardless of the number of dead bodies he left behind. He simply had the reputation of a man of the people and a bandit who distributed his wealth to the poor. The series ruthlessly breaks this perception and portrays Pablo Escobar as a destroyer of his country and society, which he systematically undermined with his activities. It is quite telling that his attacks, which targeted the general public, remained without a response, and the reaction of the political elite only came when he attacked high society. The poorer classes suffered the most from his terror. At the same time, the series also shows that Escobar was able to build his empire at a time when the United States was preoccupied with the Cold War. Once the rivalry with the Soviet Union ceased, the cartel began to decline rapidly, because the potential that was previously tied to the fight against communism could now be directed elsewhere. Overall impression: 90%.
()
Ads