The Keep

As a horror movie, laughable; as a mystery, somewhat problematic; but as a war drama? Surprisingly successful. Michael Mann didn't deny his talent for improving suspicious-looking scripts, and with the help of an ethereal soundtrack and Ian McKellen's indescribably charismatic performance, even though he speaks with a plastic blinking figurine, he managed to create an interesting atmosphere, albeit occasionally faltering due to the lack of a defined genre. However, I wouldn't search for the potential of a masterpiece like Heat in this cursed keep. (05/03/2009)

Michael Mann has never managed to take my breath away (not even with his best films, like Heat). Most of the time, I’ve had a hard time not falling asleep because his narration style is very slow. The reviews of The Keep are mixed at best, so I could expect how much fun I would have with it: little. And that was the case. The premise sounds nice, a mysterious castle in the Romanian mountains occupied by Nazis could be a great setting for a horror film, but alas. All those painted backgrounds, the dodgy special effects and the ridiculously looking evil turn those ninety minutes into an experience so tiring that even a five hour long Albanian existentialist drama would envy it. (07/07/2010)

The Keep unfortunately has number of things that make it an almost chaotic and boring slag. The characters are pretty poorly written, the pace is uneven, the special effects are laughable at best, and the music is annoying; I feel this is a premise that John Carpenter could do wonders with, he would highlight the trashiness in a creative way and would give a better style to both the heroes (especially the mysterious Scott Glenn) and the villains. But here we have Michael Mann, a precise builder of atmosphere and ideological conflicts, and the resulting film is not fun at all, but it does have an unquestionable aura and even a vision. The brutally strong back or side lighting and the permanently overheated steam machines create a surreal backdrop that literally saves the film and makes it quite a remarkable experiment. It’s as if Carpenter had left the narrative games aside and had a joint that awoke in him a desire for artsy horror with a timeless concept. It’s really weird and I’m not surprised that Mann never made another effect based film, but what I appreciate more is that a filmmaker as interesting as him has tried something so insane. 55% (02/22/2021)

Michael Mann in the early days. A rather timeworn, slowly told story, but filmed with atmosphere. In terms of acting, the picture is quite passable and so the only serious problem are the rather old-fashioned special effects and, mainly, the book the movie is based on, because it simply sets the bar too high. Outstanding as a well-made eighties B-movie, but as an adaptation of one of the best genre books, this is a bit of an insult. (01/22/2007)

Although Michael Mann is better known as "Mr. (Crime)intellectual," in his early days as a director he already clearly showed signs of his distinctive trademarks, which have followed him throughout his filmography. Despite its lack of originality, the plot is typically lengthy in Mann’s style. The story of the fortress with the mystery is told at a slow pace, where the emphasis is mainly on the dialogue unraveling the mystery. Yet it all, unfortunately, comes at the expense of the horror atmosphere, which the director builds to perfection in some moments, despite the rather primitive digital effects and the incredibly crazy music, aided mainly by the precise camerawork and, last but not least, the sympathetic cast, led by the charismatic Jürgen Prochnow. It's a B-movie, but that's what the 1980s were like. (08/19/2006)