Directed by:
Sam HargraveScreenplay:
Joe RussoCinematography:
Newton Thomas SigelCast:
Chris Hemsworth, Rudhraksh Jaiswal, Randeep Hooda, Golshifteh Farahani, Pankaj Tripathi, David Harbour, Derek Luke, Marc Donato, Geetanjali Thapa (more)VOD (1)
Plots(1)
A hardened mercenary's mission becomes a soul-searching race to survive when he's sent into Bangladesh to rescue a drug lord's kidnapped son. (Netflix)
Reviews (12)
Who gives a crap about a more sophisticated script – that’s not my issue here – but this is merely two hours of systematically emptying bottomless clips without any display of emotion whatsoever. But what about the praises sung on this site about the 15-minute “continuous take”? Well, when you make clever use of cuts (by zooming into macro details for an instant, right in the face) and unnoticeable dissolves, you can fill an entire feature-length film with such takes (just ask Sam Mendes), though it is of course all an illusion, even though it looks cool. To sum up, this is nothing new under the sun, just another yawn-inducing flick no one will remember three months from now.
()
The action is very good, all the other aspects of the film, much less so, but in quarantine mode, I didn’t mind. As a one-time Netflix flick is quite passable, even if in a normal world an “event” like this wouldn’t exist (I hope).
()
There’s a strange contemporary trend – making action movies with good actors but without emotion. Which is a pity in this case, because Chris Hemsworth usually knows how to crack jokes, like he showed us in Thor. If he got some space for that, instead of just massacring left and right like Robocop, it could have been the best action blockbuster of the decade. As it is, it’s just an average action flick with one delicious chase in the middle, where the camera was working magic and I was just gaping at the screen with my mouth hanging open.
()
In an ideal world, it would be John Wick meets The Raid with a touch of The Punisher... but hey. The first one lacks greater action exaggeration, although there is nothing to complain about with regard to most of the fights and shooting, and the film has a top stunt show-reel. Compared to Gareth Evans and his group of Indonesian suicidal people, Extraction never quite takes your breath away. Hemsworth looks good on the field, but he also carries with him a mediocre back story and a lot of boyish tenderness, which is not very believable, even though I like the guy and enjoy every one of his Instagram posts. There is only one expert on this deadly tenderness deal, and that is Joe Bernthal. I would have given it a higher score had it not been for the blatantly stupid finale and the fact that Bangladeshi Ivan Jonák should have been given more space. Thank you, BTW, for the scene with the beating of children. After a month of quarantine, it’s solidly cathartic. P. S. If someone from Netflix reads this (and they certainly will), shoot the author of the translation in the foot and pay for a proper translator. This man is a fraud and does not need to be rescued, but rather deboned.
()
Crazier version of Man on Fire, in other words another movie made by a “stuntman/director" where it is going without saying that shaky camera and frantic editing are a course of the action genre. From the same department as The Raid and Wick movies. Not in terms of the style of action, the type of movie or the uncompromising rawness, but because when watching action scenes you will inevitably delighted to say several time “I've never seen anything like this before, but I have always wanted to". You may not say it as often (basically twice; in a one-shot eleven-minute action hell while watching slums and rogues being beaten) as when watching the second Raid movie or John Wick sequel, but still more often than when watching most of the action movies from the last decades (exceptionalmovie ). On top of that, frequent action is so diverse that you won’t become bored of it. Straightforwardness does justice to this movie, the characters are sketched but functional, emotions work well, it simply does the job. The outcome is a genre move that knows what it wants to be and to who is the viewer. The only minor imperfection is a little bit too much sad, gloomy self-questioning, a too yellow toning and a rather open ending.
()
There hasn't been a more action-packed ride from the USA since John Wick 3! Netflix went ahead and plunked down a pretty penny and the only thing that sucks about the film is that we didn't get to see it on the big screen. Chris Hemsworth is tasked with rescuing the son of a crime boss in the harsh world of Bangladesh, which is a huge plus as this is a setting we're not entirely familiar with from movies. Debutant Sam Hargrave is primarily a stuntman and it shows in the action scenes, which are absolutely perfect. The fights are dynamic, sharp, raw, clear and with a lot of contact, and the original car chase or the final shootout on the bridge are delightful, they will please any fan of sharp and uncompromising action. I also praise the camera work, which literally draws the viewer into the action, and the very fast pace. Good stuff. Story***, Action*****, Humor>No, Violence****, Entertainment*****, Music****, Visuals*****, Atmosphere****, Suspense****. 8.5/10.
()
Thanks to being set in a convincingly dirty environment, Liam Hemsworth's muscle mass, and the fantastic pace where one attraction is swapped out for another, the adventures of the hero with the super tough name Tyler Rake landed in terms of mood one or two classes more higher than the much praised and often compared John Wick. The combination of mercenaries, the desperate fates of children of soldiers of fortune, and the action-packed aspects polished to the last cut compensate for the fact that this does not offer (nor does it seek to offer) anything new to the classical screenplay.
()
Extraction has an indisputably significant place on the notional chart of trends in the action genre. This dot chart, marked out in one plane by unbridled low-budget action movies with athletic, ready-for-anything actors and in the opposite by constrained Hollywood big-budget productions with stars, shows us in the points the emphasis on action as an attraction and the evocation of the wow effect by the physical dimension. In this definition, however, Extraction is not an essential or revolutionary milestone. Rather, the very fact that it appeared on that notional chart further reinforces the hope that better times are ahead for the action genre in Hollywood. Sam Hargrave emerges from this as a good and likable apprentice of the 87eleven stunt school and stands somewhere between his masters Chad Stahelski and David Leitch. But Hemsworth is neither Keanu Reeves nor Tom Cruise, so he obviously does not have years of training or personal commitment under his belt. Therefore, his director and choreographer have to come up with gimmicks such as one seeming long shot that is digitally stitched together, which, with its obvious transitions, only brings to mind the ambitions of filmmakers from the lower budget categories, but who gain greater fondness through their greater tenacity despite the production conditions (in, for example, Universal Soldier: Day of Reckoning) or honest craftsmanship (such as in Jailbreak). And that’s not to mention projects that still remain unsurpassed today, where physical action and directorial craft achieve the ideal synergy, us as in The Raid 2. ____ Extraction is a fine contribution to the genre that shows Netflix’s potential, but also its real face as a video rental company. And that will perhaps remain the primary benefit of this project. Netflix is surprisingly consistent in bringing the schizophrenic “VoD video rental” label to mind. Although it will never achieve the pampered selection and community function that carefully curated autonomous video rental shops offered, it needs a regular supply of shiny new products, following the example of the major chains. In the best case, they will attract viewers to the more out-of-the-way sections, where they will discover not unique gems, but a bunch of other genre flicks that will compel them not to cancel their subscriptions. So, if you find yourself in these nooks and crannies because of Netflix’s recommendations, have a look at some of the films mentioned above. However, after these years of shakycams and CGI colouring books that completely lack a physical dimension, we can once again look forward to the coming development. It even makes one want to talk about the renaissance of the action genre.
()
Little buggers. Chris Hemsworth beats Indian kids! With top-notch action scenes driven by a straightforward plot from an unknown comic book, Extraction benefits mainly from the mad verve of director Sam Hargrave, who didn’t hesitate to tie himself to the top of a car with a camera to get the desired result. And really the one-shot car chase in the Benz through a hostile Dhaka makes the film worth watching again and again. Kids with Kalashnikovs on every street corner, dirt, blood and slit throats stay the course set by Wick. The future of action movies is not rosy, it’s blood red!
()
A bit of John Wick, a bit of The Raid, and an awfully ordinary plot. It’s still good stuff, though. Hemsworth handles the action decently and isn't afraid of the more daring stunts, which is commendable. Extraction does wink at Evans from behind the scenes, but it can be considered another in a long line of flashy action flicks. Especially the car chase scene in one take, or running around a house – these are first class stunts. I was tempted to believe that it was an unrecognizably made-up Rose Byrne in a cool Indian look, but it wasn't.
()
After Triple Frontier, another likeably uncompromising and gritty action flick from Netflix. The choreography and direction are so predatory and imaginative that there are several scenes that I wanted to rewatch immediately after the credits rolled, and I did. The story is simple, but it also manages to surprise with one unusual, yet logical alliance in particular, and the quiet ending didn't bother me at all, quite the opposite – I felt like I needed a breather. I trusted Chris Hemsworth with everything.
()
As the most action-packed film of the year, and possibly Netflix's best offering this year, Extraction truly stands out. Sam Hargrave, previously known for his work as a stuntman and fight choreographer, ensures that the film excels in its action sequences. My concern was more about the story, fearing it might come off as unnecessarily clichéd and thus less enjoyable from a viewer’s perspective. While the plot isn’t the most intricate aspect of the project, it serves its purpose well enough for what it is—a straightforward action romp. However, the most exciting part is the action scenes, which will likely go down in history. The John Wick-style choreography fits the film perfectly, and with its R rating, it delivers brutal violence without holding back on the blood. The camera work is clear and not chaotic, making it easy to follow each fight and shootout, with no excessive cuts that would make you want to pull your hair out. The 12-minute single-shot sequence is a visual feast. Chris Hemsworth pleasantly surprised me; while I knew he had talent, his performance, even in the most intense emotional moments, really stood out. The gritty settings of the streets in India and Bangladesh, where corruption and injustice are rampant, also added to the film's appeal. The final epilogue on the bridge is just the cherry on top. I agree that it bears some resemblance to Tony Scott’s Man on Fire, though it lacks a bit of that film's excellence. Nonetheless, it’s definitely a film I’ll revisit. I give it 85%.
()
Ads