Saving Private Ryan

Steven Spielberg directed undoubtedly the most impressive film about World War II. The opening D-Day landing alone shocked me with its brutal depiction, clearly showcasing the horrific slaughter it was. Then we got to know the main combat group that guided the viewers through the film. The cast is top-notch, led by Tom Hanks’s outstanding performance as Captain John Miller. In supporting roles, others also impressed, especially Jeremy Davies (his final near-redemption for a critical mistake was flawless) and Barry Pepper. The journey of all these characters was filmed so authentically by the creators that I believed their struggles with all the obstacles thrown in their path without reservation, and I experienced their encounters with Nazi forces fully, with no shortage of emotions. Technically, I simply have no words. The harmony of every image with accompanying sounds and music is rarely seen... I understand the Oscars received for this. And of course, the battles, which I believe still hold the status of the most successful in the history of cinema in this genre. The ending is epic but not exaggerated, and it is emotionally powerful, squeezing every bit of emotion out of the viewer, you can believe that. My heart swelled at many of the amazing scenes presented by this film. Spielberg made a genuine treasure that should be protected by all available means. Truly a masterpiece. I give it 93%. (09/03/2019)

From a formal point of view, i.e., from the perspective of the film craft, there is not much to criticize about the film, almost nothing. It is an emotionally and extremely expensive blockbuster, which rightfully belongs in film history, especially with its opening 15-minute battle sequence. There could be endless things to say about Steven Spielberg's directing abilities, about how he can work with visual composition, build up a scene, and direct actors - and it would all be praise. However, what concerns me more is the formulaic script, the same problem I had with Spielberg's Schindler's List. When I compare this film to Klimov's drama Come and See, for example, I clearly feel Spielberg's superficiality. To label this film as just a popcorn flick would be grossly unfair, as there are incomparably worse films of its kind. It is undoubtedly an attempt at a serious war drama, but I fail to understand why Spielberg is not satisfied with real stories and real war history and feels the need to produce fiction. Sometimes the unnecessary pathos also bothered me, especially toward the end. Overall impression: 70%. (06/14/2006)

My friend told me that during the opening scene of the landing on Omaha Beach, she wanted to run out of the theater, but she was so hypnotized by what was happening on the screen that she stayed seated. This is a film purely for the big screen and good sound, where bullets fly around you and you feel that you are physically there with them, that you are part of the action. The first half hour has become legendary. (04/13/2003)

I first saw the film over ten years ago. And I was thrilled. The second time I saw it was five years ago, and I was still thrilled. Today, on the third viewing, it was glaringly obvious how dumb the story is, and it's really just about having a touching finale so the old man can deliver his lines. It's pathetic how Spielberg preaches, but it's still a good movie. The landing is unbeatable. (03/30/2016)

I'm neither a fan nor a great connoisseur of war movies, but show me one that is more emotionally packed than this Spielberg masterpiece. The opening with the Normandy landings will deservedly go down in film history as one of the most impressive scenes ever. The final battle is another perfect display of military strategy, and the film as a whole is a relentless exhibition of one of the greatest filmmakers of all time. Amazing atmosphere, amazing actors, brilliant camera work and harsh reality in every way. No one will ever make something like that again, I'll bet. (05/31/2012)