Directed by:
Quentin TarantinoScreenplay:
Quentin TarantinoCinematography:
Andrzej SekulaCast:
Harvey Keitel, Tim Roth, Michael Madsen, Chris Penn, Steve Buscemi, Lawrence Tierney, Randy Brooks, Kirk Baltz, Edward Bunker, Quentin Tarantino, David Steen (more)VOD (3)
Plots(1)
Six unacquainted professional criminals are brought together by a veteran thief to execute an intricately planned diamond robbery. (official distributor synopsis)
Videos (1)
Reviews (9)
Mr. White, Mr. Blond, Mr. Blue, Mr. Orange, Mr. Brown, and Mr. Pink are supposed to rob a jewelry store. Something goes wrong, or rather someone betrays them. Mr. Orange gets it in the stomach, and Mr. White tries to take him to a safe, pre-arranged meeting place: the warehouse. Mr. White is wondering what to do next when Mr. Pink comes in. They are wondering what the hell happened... This is roughly the beginning of Tarantino’s first excellent film, which, together with Pulp Fiction, is among the pearls of world cinema. Top acting performances, excellent screenplay, great directing, cult lines, and, above all, plausibility, make the Reservoir Dogs an unforgettable cinematic experience.
()
Before Quentin Tarantino's arrival, either generous, academically precise gangster films were being made, such as The Godfather series or Once Upon a Time in the West, or cheap and terrible B-movies that couldn't be taken seriously. Tarantino brought new energy, vulgarity, and interesting characters to the crime genre - his characters are a collection of various psychopaths and scoundrels of the worst kind - and above all, he brought back the entertainment value and attractiveness to crime films for film fans. Elements typical of his style are present in his debut - the alternating timelines, dialogue-driven scenes, violence portrayed as entertainment, and a provocatively pop-cultural mix of music motifs. In his beginnings, Tarantino worked to create a significant revival and I truly like his early films, unlike his recent works. If I can criticize anything about Reservoir Dogs, it would be its rather short runtime, as it could easily have been half an hour longer, and the audience could have gotten to know the fates of the remaining members of the gang. An inexpensive film that scored points with its excellent casting and provocative content. Overall impression: 90%.
()
A truly unique and unrepeatable film. Firstly, with its gore, stylish directness and brutal amount of catchphrases in the space of one single room, secondly, with the brilliant opening dialogue in the restaurant, which still ranks among the top of Tarantino's work, and finally, because it’s the feature debut of the most iconic director of our time. Reservoir Dogs is not as thought-provoking and broad as Pulp Fiction, and there are two or three places where Quentin squeaks and creaks a bit, but that doesn't change the fact that only he can make a thriller this entertaining and sophisticated. The team of elite actors complement each other perfectly with emotions flowing during their quarrels, the setting of an abandoned warehouse perfectly intensifies the tense atmosphere and the very simple plot is sketched in an original and unpredictable way, so that the viewer can't get their eyes off the screen for a second. A special tribute to Keitel and Buscemi, who steal the show mainly for themselves, and I add a fifth star for the excellent final scene, which not even Pulp Fiction can boast.
()
Paradoxically, Reservoir Dogs was my "last Tarantino movie". I got exactly what I expected, and given that those expectations were high, I found absolutely no fault with it. A typical Quentin mosaic, great music, dialogue (it's just cool) and a foreshadowing of future Pulp Fiction or Jackie Brown style of flicks to come.
()
A gangster movie that's more about dialogue than guns isn't really my thing. The film is so talky that you don't manage to notice half of the things let alone absorb them, the actors are unknown, uninteresting and second rate, the wisecracks were neither funny nor cool – Quentin Tarantino clearly has a different sense of humour than I do, and I haven't seen a film that bored me at a mere 99 minutes in a long time. 50% for the director and for his craftsmanship, but never more torture for me.
()
Ads