Operation Fortune: Ruse de guerre

After the phenomenal The Gentlemen, my expectations for Operation Fortune may have been too high, but I didn't leave the cinema disappointed. Guy Ritchie's latest is a brisk one-watch action flick with some issues when it comes to the script and (black) humour, but it flows nicely in the cinema, and thanks to the regularly dosed action it doesn't get boring. It was good to see Josh Hartnett in action after quite a long time, but the main driving forces are the cruel Jason Statham and the equally sharp Hugh Grant, for whom such roles just tailor-made. In the end, the film neither impresses nor surprises, but it entertains and thrills, and that's what counts. A weaker four stars! (01/25/2023)

It is missing some visual highlight, some memorable scene that would make you want to watch it again. But otherwise it is a pretty solid film, and I could easily see Guy Ritchie as the new Bond director, though he probably doesn't even aspire to that, he's comfortable in the company of those weird underworld folks. Hugh Grant is an excellent sleazeball, Jason Statham is just Jason Statham, the same kind of actor that makes us love him so much, and Aubrey Plaza is a sweetheart when she's not all made up and trying to look sexy (she's really bad at that), but the one that was pleasantly surprised me was Josh Hartnett. I don't understand what messed up the career of this fun and charismatic guy, but hopefully after this and Oppenheimer it will get better. (03/30/2024)

Orson Fortune and his team must prevent the sale of a weapon that could threaten the entire world. To do so, they must get close to a dangerous adversary, and they're going to use a Hollywood superstar to do it. Guy Ritchie delivers an entertaining action-spy comedy that's driven forward by a particularly likeable cast. Unfortunately, they're a bit undermined by a muddled script, which often makes the story pause unnecessarily and deal with irrelevancies, only to have to unnecessarily plunge forward a few moments later. It's not boring, but one expects a bit more from Ritchie and Statham. (01/12/2023)

This is exactly the kind of film that would have blown producers away in the 90s. It just needs better dialogue with at least one memorable line and a lead actor who captivates you from start to finish. Unfortunately, Jason Statham doesn’t quite hit the mark these days. He lacks both the charisma and the punchy lines that made 90s action heroes so entertaining. Still, unlike in the 90s, he’s one of the few actors who continues to make films like this. (07/16/2024)

Guy Ritchie's Mission: Impossible wannabe. And not bad at all. It would rather rank among the more accomplished in the series (solid plotting, the action is both rich and old-fashioned), though it's the least inventive because it sticks too closely to the genre rules. (08/18/2024)

Attractive locations, expensive cars and booze, luxurious accessories both living and dead—these are all part of the business card Guy Ritchie could send to Barbara Broccoli if he wanted to. But he doesn’t. He’d rather continue living in his world of picturesque characters, dressing actors in stylish outfits, and promoting barbecue tables of his own design. Even though it all runs at about three-quarters throttle, with dialogues often in the child seat and the author skipping his traditional top-notch opening credits, it still offers solid entertainment. However, let’s admit that it would be less enjoyable without Grant. By the way, if Statham’s top collar button flew off, would filming stop until someone sews it back on? (05/10/2023)

A subversive version of Mission Impossible, where they steal a ChatGPT that can launch nukes and point fingers at the Soviets. Unfortunately, it's unexpectedly bland, almost soporific at times without the crazy stunts of Mad Tom. On top of that, some of the villains are Ukrainian, and that’s just not trendy today. The acting is great, Statham is excellent again, only Cary Elwes didn't suit me here. The script, despite some stylish dialogue (or Grant's exquisite final monologue), lacks drive, is muddled and falls short of the typical Ritchie standard. I felt like he got bored during the shooting and tried to finish it quickly so he could get on with The Covenant. (05/12/2023)

Guy Ritchie would probably make a great Bond movie, but he doesn't need to, he prefers to play in his backyard, which he knows well, and gives us what we like. This time, don't expect big plot twists, but straightforward action entertainment that kind of combines The Man from U.N.C.L.E. with Gentlemen and, apart from Ritchie's more or less visible directorial ideas (I was already impressed by the opening with the footsteps that turn into music), it mainly relies on the performances. Jason Statham is Jason Statham again, but this time in that funny way, Aubrey Plaza is absolutely perfect, and every scene Josh Hartnett and Hugh Grant do together is priceless. This is the kind of cleverly entertaining film I enjoy going to the cinema for the most. (01/13/2023)

Guy Ritchie kind of goes on autopilot and Operation Fortune follows in the footsteps of flashy superficial crap like The Man from U.N.C.L.E. rather than his last cool and functional notches Gentlemen and Angry Man, but it's cool nonetheless. We get a mix of Bond and M:I in typical Ritchie style, but without an interesting main villain, a surprising script and no wow action scenes. The humour and catchphrases are only as fertile as ever, the main characters are practically impossible to care about, and at times it seems as if Ritchie is getting too drunk on his own shots, but the pace is as it should be, and at least it doesn't have an overlong running time, as has been the case with everything lately. (01/04/2023)

Guy Ritchie is a terribly ambivalent and strange director. His name has been resonating in the film world for the last year for the absolute top of the action genre, Wrath of Man, but now he throws us such a dreadfully average thing as Operation Fortune: Ruse de guerre. And when I say average, I mean literally average in every way. The acting is terribly bland, none of the three stars, Jason Statham, Hugh Grant, and Aubrey Plaza, have iconic roles, they are typical B-movie characters with no interesting traits, and there's only two action sequences towards the end, and they also suck. There's no action, above average fights, shootouts or hand-to-hand combat, and then the story is a despicable template full of bland clichés. And the humour? Zero! The whole film is completely devoid of ideas, effort and any kind of fun. In fact, I have to say that for the first time in a long time, I looked at my watch in the cinema and if I had watched the film at home, I probably wouldn't have finished it. Extremely mediocre crap that I won't remember a week later. And it pisses me all the more because this was spawned by a guy like Ritchie, everyone will compare it to Wrath of Man, and that's the stumbling block that drives the film's rating into drastic below-average territory. All I ask after watching it is WHY. (01/05/2023)

I didn’t enjoy this movie and, apparently, neither did the actors and Guy Ritchie. Synonymous with routine and zero imagination. The only interesting thing is the completely uninteresting title, which (whether it was signed off by Ritchie or the guys in marketing) destined the film to fail, because who in their right mind would want to say "2 tickets for Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre, please", ugh. (05/14/2023)