Directed by:
Robert HarmonScreenplay:
Eric RedCinematography:
John SealeComposer:
Mark IshamCast:
Rutger Hauer, C. Thomas Howell, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Jeffrey DeMunn, John M. Jackson, Billy Green Bush, Armin Shimerman, Gene Davis, Henry Darrow (more)Plots(1)
A magnanimous young man who picks up a strange hitchhiker on a desert highway on a dark, rainy night soon wishes he had just driven on. The deranged hitchhiker turns the innocent fellow's journey into a living nightmare. (official distributor synopsis)
Videos (1)
Reviews (8)
An above-average and stylish B-movie thriller with a demonic Rutger Hauer in the main role. Unlike the remake, this one has an atmosphere that is pleasantly chilling at times. The story is really unpredictable, which raises the question of whether that is due to the genius of the screenwriter or in spite of it.
()
A wannabe action horror film with one significantly shot scene (the gas station explosion :)) that brings nothing new to the genre. However, Rutger Hauer as The Hitcher is perfectly nasty and yet very charismatic at the same time, so I see it at around 65-70% in the end. One of the things I still quite enjoyed was the volatility of the relationship between Jim and John.
()
The fact that Rutger Hauer is a demon has been known for ages. Yet the main strength of this film is surprisingly the script, which throws in one unexpected twist after another. The sometimes implausible and set-up plot twists only work to the benefit of the cause, which consists of building atmosphere and the viewer's uncertainty. And any person whose chin didn't fall at the scene with the unhooked tractor-trailer is not a good person in my book. 4 ½. Rounded up this time, although the girl's motivation still boggles my mind.
()
"Why didn't he kill us?" I’ll take you through the movie itself very quickly. An atmospheric, suspenseful and perfectly played game of cat and mouse in the middle of scorched wilderness. Jim’s feeling of despair enthralls. Almost like something from Hitch. And it’s spiced up with a pinch of pleasant eighties incorrectness. The downsides? In places screenwriter’s block solve some situations like Ryder’s deus ex machina entrance. Still, the first thing that will occur to you when you hear The Hitchhiker mentioned in conversation will be John Ryder, played by Rutger Hauer. He doesn’t say much. Nor does he have to. His actions speak loudly enough for him. Many consider the main minus to be the mysteriousness and lack of explanation of Ryder’s motives. But for me that it what makes this picture an exceptional work. Countless cranks and psychopaths appeared, appear and will continue to appear on the movie screen. But in the end not many of them are so disturbing as this mysterious hitchhiker. Why does he do it? What motivates him? What happened to him in the past? Why doesn’t he exist “on paper"? No answers. That just means that the details like the choice of stone that he gives Jim or the wedding ring, which could as easily be a movie goof as an intentional detail from the creators. The character provokes a quantity of questions. On the one hand, you want to know more, while on the other you know that if you got the answers it would lose all of its magic. That character just gets right under your skin...
()
An above-average road thriller with a clever plot. Almost every scene of The Hitcher is steeped in darkness and despair. The main protagonist Jim Halsey is psychologically terrorized by an unforgettable Rutger Hauer in the role of John Ryder who is indisputably one of the greatest psychos to hit the silver screen. And I probably needn’t even mention the cult scene with the french fries. And Isham’s music completes the dreary atmosphere of the whole movie. And the final lesson: NEVER PICK UP HITCHHIKERS.
()
Ads