Backcountry

It is impossible to avoid a slight disappointment, because it is far from being a survival drama with a bear as I suppose we all thought. The bear is only here for 15 minutes, it looks very nice and the brutal attack on the tent has a perfect atmosphere, and the beautiful representation of human entrails is a pleasure, but that's all. At least the film has beautiful scenery, is decently shot, and even though mostly nothing happens, it doesn't bore and leaves you in anticipation. IT was nice the likeable couple were nicely equipped (first-aid kit, bear spray, flares), the mysterious stranger was pretty freaky, but that he didn't show up in the film anymore I take as a big minus, the guy could have caused a decent mess. The finale was more or less not even there, it ends unfinished and I hate that. But 60%, and the build up to a fourth star was there, but I can’t forgive the ending with no duel, no fights and no climax. (03/23/2015)

There are only a few actors here. Four who actually get some space. But that doesn’t harm Backcountry. Its strength lies in how it utilizes the beautiful scenery to create drama, which often unfolds off-screen, but that certainly doesn't diminish its impact. On the contrary, there is strength even in that. It's just a pity that the atmosphere isn't a little more escalated. Still a good film. (11/11/2015)

Much better than last year's thematically similar Grizzly. But Backcountry does without the well-known actors and the perfectly trained bear Bart (who can play even the most subtle nuances of expression). While the central bear doesn't look all that menacing on the surface, can't even stand on its hind legs properly, and is even noticeably artificial in some close-ups, he's still much more frightening by acting quite authentically. It's not an unconvincingly intelligent monster that takes revenge and systematically murders people, as in the aforementioned Grizzly, but a normal hungry animal roaming the woods that scares with its unpredictability. The first half is tedious and it's a shame the film doesn't start building tension much earlier. The bear attack, which is visible in only a few shots, is relatively brief but all the more believable. And I imagine that's probably how it would have played out in reality. The whole tent scene, by the way, reminded me of a similarly chilling moment in Herzog's documentary Grizzly Man. (03/29/2015)

Deliverance with a bear. The script is fairly tame, but just enough to maintain credibility, and at the right moments, to stretch to the limit the negative feelings about the suffering of the two main characters. The bear attack scene is one of the most shocking and intense I've ever seen in film; after seeing it, nobody can convince me to go hiking in the countryside. (08/11/2017)

A very realistic and minimalist survival flick, the script can’t have been more than five pages long. I think that’s what it must look like when two people get lost while camping in the wilderness and get attacked by a bear on their way back. The level of credibility and crudeness is very high in Backcountry, including those “main” scenes when the bear attacks. It’s on a completely different level (in conception and ambition) that this year’s Grizzly, fortunately so, I must say. My only quibbles are the self-serving and pointless episodes with the foreigner and that the survival part “proper” begins rather late. Edit: I sometimes think about this film, even a year later, and that main attack scene still remains very much alive. Quality. (03/26/2015)