Directed by:
Woody AllenScreenplay:
Woody AllenCinematography:
Vittorio StoraroCast:
Jesse Eisenberg, Steve Carell, Kristen Stewart, Blake Lively, Sheryl Lee, Paul Schackman, Richard Portnow, Jeannie Berlin, Ken Stott, Woody Allen (narrator) (more)Plots(1)
Set in the 1930s, Woody Allen’s bittersweet romance Café Society follows Bronx-born Bobby Dorfman (Jesse Eisenberg) to Hollywood, where he falls in love, and back to New York, where he is swept up in the vibrant world of high society nightclub life. With Café Society, Woody Allen conjures up a 1930s world that has passed to tell a deeply romantic tale of dreams that never die. (Warner Bros. Home Entertainment)
(more)Videos (2)
Reviews (10)
Say what you will, but this is the Woody Allen I love so much (though his pure-blooded comedies are even better for me). The most amazing thing to me about Café Society is that it's the first film in which Jesse Eisenberg plays a likable person, and he really is likable. His Bobby is not poor, whiny or desperate, and instead he has courage, he's quite a bold young man and that's fine. Kristen Stewart stuck out a bit at first because of the beautiful period atmosphere, but after a few minutes she fell into it, Steve Carell is a great actor, period, and Blake Lively charms just about everyone. It's also great that Allen's script knows moderation - there are so many things that could have been developed and talked about further, it's just that there's no need, everything important is said and anything extra would just slow Café Society down. This is also true of the ending, which comes at a beautiful moment. As for the criticisms, I have to disagree loudly, especially with those that despise Ben's story and say it is unnecessary. On the contrary, I see an ingenious parallel in it - giving up Judaism and accepting Christianity "for the sake of advantage" is the same as leaving one person you love for another you prefer.
()
Woody Allen seems a bit worn out in this film. Sure, it's very well shot, the dialogues occasionally make sense and are even interesting, if not entertaining, but overall, I kind of felt like it was about nothing in particular. I couldn't really connect with the characters, and for example, the second Veronica seemed unnecessary and self-serving, although, of course, she has a certain purpose.
()
Woody Allen is still making the same thing, but in an increasingly heady and mature way, and in an increasingly refined formal package. Another accurate and perfectly shot relationship drama from the 1930-40s in the irresistible glitter of the bygone glory of the old party cabarets, frills and refinement of the elite of the time. It's a film that is all the more powerful the more times you find yourself in the various relationship and emotional breakdowns of the main characters. Someday Woody will be remembered a lot, as he was able to extract a bunch of stuff from life and put it on film with refinement and insight, yet crystal clear truth like few filmmakers, and in an original and typically quirky way that has become his own and he applies it as his signature trendy trademark.
()
The enchanting atmosphere of the Golden Age of Hollywood era and the playing out of a love story promises more than
what the movie can deliver in its second half: a clichéd love tangle and the unnecessary secondary storyline with a
gangster brother. Jesse Eisenberg and Steve Carell are great, while Kristen Stewart doesn’t seem the right choice for her role. Blake Lively
would deserve more space, though the development of her character would probably bring more clichés to the film. The
movie feels longer than it actually is. A tired Woody. Two and a half stars.
()
51st KVIFF – Allen has made a recycled, safe comedy snack. Eisenberg plays a confident and absent-minded young man. Steward city is a mess, so there’s balance in the universe and everything is where it should be. The characters aren’t real people, but one-dimensional figures on the chessboard of Woody’s humour, and everything just fizzles out.
()
Ads