The King's Man

The King's Man is nothing more than a series of random scenes in a very vague parallel to historical events. Some scenes give the viewer enough visual enticements and WTF moments. Plus, I would rather not think about how pointless the storyline is and how it does not really make any sense. Plus, the big revelation of the bad guy, delivered as a huge twist (which the viewer had already figured out after five minutes of watching this movie), could not possibly have been something Matthew Vaughn was serious about. (02/04/2022)

Somehow it just isn’t what it used to be. Setting it in the World War I gave it a more earthy feel, but Vaughn just isn’t trying as hard anymore. While the first part was overflowing with visual finesse and sly jabs, this movie is mostly serious. But the story has a couple of interesting twists and hats off to the respect for historical events, but if it weren’t for Rasputin, there would be nothing to praise. And of course we know how the Great War ended up and it’s unreasonable to expect the opposite from Tarantino here. (02/15/2022)

The first two Kingsman films captivated audiences mainly with their distinctive style, perfect cinematography, stunning visuals and great execution, and I can happily say that the third installment was of the same quality. It took away from the colourful visuals, the punk high-tech style and stepped a bit into the past, but all the other characteristics remained. After a for me too historical introduction to the story, we then dive into the perfect action, spy-clever plot and it's full speed until the end. The film doesn't lack for excellent characters, whether on the side of good guys or bad guys, lively action, highlights in the form of Rasputin's ballet duel or the knife fight in the trenches, but equally a strong villain, a disarming twist in the middle that I'm sure no one expects, and an entertaining finale. I'm actually unexpectedly pleased with the result then, and although it's not quite as good as the first instalment because I tend to prefer the teenage futuristic elements that were missing here and the film actually went in exactly the opposite direction to what I would have liked, it's still a successful cinema visit that managed to surprise in places. (01/08/2022)

The somewhat misleading trailers, Matthew Vaughn's reputation, and especially what he did in the first two films, set the stage for another frantic action flick, just set a hundred years earlier. But there was a surprise in the cinema – a very pleasant one for me. Apparently, Vaughn decided that the story of the birth of the Kingsman Agency would be just as much the birth of his unmistakable directorial style, and that's a million dollar idea. This makes The King's Man a surprisingly subdued film for a good while, one that cares about the characters, and when it comes to action, it's good but deliberately keeps a low profile. Vaughn seems to be discovering that frantic style himself with each passing scene, while the heroes unravel a giant conspiracy in a story full of twists and turns (including a truly shocking one) and gather typical Kingsman attributes to become the King's Men in the final three-quarters of an hour. Vaughn got unleashed, started slowing down shots, put the camera on wings and swords, fiddled with shots (my favourite is the duel of silhouettes against the backdrop of the movie screen with the turmoil of war) and simply kept giving the audience what they were waiting for. For some the wait will be long, but others will be royally entertained. (01/12/2022)

If all those amazing visual ideas, the surprisingly resolved situations and the sweetly over-the-top humour were wrapped in something called a meaningful plot and not a twisted alternate reality pulled out of someone’s ass like from the pen of a drunken Vondruška, I'd be happy. Give Vaughn the next Bond movie, really, the guy's got it. (03/31/2022)