Directed by:
Guillermo del ToroCinematography:
Dan LaustsenComposer:
Nathan JohnsonCast:
Bradley Cooper, Cate Blanchett, Toni Collette, Willem Dafoe, Richard Jenkins, Rooney Mara, Ron Perlman, Mary Steenburgen, David Strathairn, Mark Povinelli (more)VOD (2)
Plots(1)
When charismatic but down-on-his-luck Stanton Carlisle (Bradley Cooper) endears himself to clairvoyant Zeena (Toni Collette) and her has-been mentalist husband Pete (David Strathairn) at a traveling carnival, he crafts what seems to be a golden ticket to success. The more he uses his newly acquired knowledge to grift the wealthy elite of 1940s New York society, the more his ambition grows. Soon, with the virtuous Molly (Rooney Mara) loyally by his side, Stanton plots to con a dangerous tycoon (Richard Jenkins) with the aid of a mysterious psychiatrist (Cate Blanchett), who might turn out to be his most formidable opponent yet. (Google Play)
(more)Videos (5)
Reviews (10)
The continuation of a cycle of stories, which, like Crimson Peak and The Shape of Water, lay dusty in the attic until Guillermo del Toro came along and turned it into a visual masterpiece with the help of a stellar cast, one that critics admire but audiences do not. However, compared to the aforementioned works, Nightmare Alley is more mature, thoughtful, confident, and ambitious in its setting and themes. It plays with psychology, noir, detective stories, or almost a hundred-year-old horrors, and despite the predictable twist, it describes the narrative circle almost perfectly. Perhaps only the screenwriting habit of making the main character make exactly the mistakes that the supporting characters (often repeatedly) warn her against seems unnecessary to me since Pan's Labyrinth. But for lovers of the spine-chilling and immersion into images that look like they have aged for decades, this manipulative journey is a sure bet and, for me, the best del Toro film since Hellboy II: The Golden Army.
()
I’m not fond of carnivals from the first half of the 20th century, with their bizarreness, the way their tormented animals and boasted about the deformity of disabled people, but the setting in the late 1930s and early 1940s suits me. However, I feel that the story and its plot arc is not so substantial to justify the enormous runtime. I would have cut the beginning at the carnival by half, maybe more, and nothing would have happened, leaving Bradley and Rooney Mara's reunion and , for the final (very funny, by the way) twist, the important monologue of the the demonic Willem Dafoe about how they recruit human scum to play the role of renegades who are locked permanently in a cage and eat chickens alive. On the other hand, if I were Del Toro I'd focus more on the intrigue in the big city, its grimness and depravity, because Cate Blanchett is a great femme fatale and the sparks between her and Bradley are electrifying. Overall, I enjoyed it, but a pair of scissors for the editor would have been really nice. But it's hard when you consider how much del Toro loves the bizarreness of the old fairs and carnivals, he must have felt like a kid in a candy store in their backdrop.
()
Looking at Guillermo del Toro's filmography, I'd say Nightmare Alley might just be his most layered work yet. Set in the 1940s, it starts off as an occult drama within the world of a circus, only to morph into a full-blown noir in the second half. The cinematography is stunning, and the atmosphere thickens perfectly, suggesting del Toro's usual supernatural touch, which he intriguingly subdues with stark pragmatism as the film progresses. It's a bit unexpected, but with stellar performances, this film stands out as one of the most intriguing releases in recent memory.
()
Nightmare Alley drew me to the cinema mainly because of the cast, the premise and, of course, the name of the director. Guillermo Del Toro's films are brimming with distinctive visuals and his latest is no different, aided by the inclusion of the film noir genre, where visuals are essential. I hadn't read the source material, nor had I seen the original film, yet I had a hunch in the first quarter what the outcome would be, thanks in part to its striking resemblance to the iconic Freaks. I admit that I may have expected more from Nightmare Alley, but I still enjoyed it in the cinema, even if it could have benefited from a slightly shorter running time. I was also expecting it to be darker and more brutal – not that I felt the need to see gallons of blood. Acting-wise, however, it was good, especially in the case of Cate Blanchett, but Bradley Cooper also played his part. Last but not least, I commend the likeable and mysterious soundtrack. Three and less than half stars!
()
Guillermo has stepped away from his beloved monster(s) and with the grace of a visual perfectionist and a focused depicter of dark, bizarre and fragile characters, he has made the most mature film of his career so far. Nightmare Alley is a psychological drama about false pretense leading to a loss of one’s self, a visual retro pleasure with every shot, the camera gently floating even in the most intimate dialogue scenes. While watching Nightmare Alley, you will recall Browning’s classic Freaks, and your soul will be soothed by the delicate noir stylization and each of the actors’ performances, which adorn the film like a Christmas tree. The protagonist is the story’s worst character – a charismatic but inwardly depraved liar who manipulates the trusting people around him. In the surprising casting of Bradley Cooper, it’s all the more impressive and entertaining to see how splendidly the actor handles playing that character.
()
Ads